Re: Nassim Haramein begin_of_the_skype_highlighting     end_of_the_skype_highlighting

The Schwarzschild Proton

A recent paper by Nassim Haramein titled "The Schwarzschild Proton" presents a model for the proton as a mini black hole and derives the proton structure from the vacuum energy and suggests, among other things, that protons are attracted to each other by gravitation rather than a “strong force.” This view of the quantum world produces a unification of the forces and appropriately predicts (for first order approximation) measured values for the nucleon of atoms.

The paper shows that properties such as the proton's magnetic moment fit such a model.  Most importantly, while the paper is brief, it attempts to give a source for mass and the strong force, issues often ignored by current theories. 

Note that the CASYS conference "best paper" awarded of its “Physics, Quantum Mechanics, Relativity, Field Theory, and Gravitation” section is signed by several peers.

See: http://theresonanceproject.org/best_paper_award.html.

See this list to examine the papers Haramein was competing against in this section:

http://theresonanceproject.org/casys09.html. 

And by the way, the CASYS conferences are not about computers, as alleged in several of the comments, but are about computing anticipatory systems, in other words, strategies to compute anticipatory systems as defined by the director and founder of the conference. From the CASYS website:

"After Daniel Dubois, a computing anticipatory system is a system that computes its current states in taking into account its past and present states but also its potential future states. Daniel M. Dubois introduced the following concepts of Strong and Weak Anticipation:

Strong anticipation refers to an anticipation of events built by or embedded in a system.  Weak anticipation refers to an anticipation of events predicted or forecasted from a model of a system.

(For more information read: Daniel M. Dubois, Introduction to Computing Anticipatory Systems, International Journal of Computing Anticipatory Systems, Publ. by CHAOS, vol. 2, pp. 3-14, 1998. ISSN 1373-5411 ISBN 2-9600179-2-7.)

This applies significantly to physics, and the conference is well attended by international physicists, physics teams and physics Nobel laureates alike.

The paper has generated wide-ranging comments which are often misguided or fail to understand the approach and therefore often dismiss the ideas involved.  We encourage you to read further and understand the issues.  Answers to an extensive critique of the paper may be found at:

"The Schwarzschild Proton Manifesto" at:  http://theresonanceproject.org/sp_manifesto.html

(some 50 pages of discussion) and the "Letter to Bobathon" at:  http://theresonanceproject.org/bob.html

 
These documents answer in detail many concerns about the model and the approach taken.  Please read them to further understand this paper.

A short description of the paper and its results may be found at:

Dr. Hyson's Schwarzschild Proton Comments at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XG4T3cUXL8

and

Dr. Hyson's Blog about the Schwarzschild Proton at: www.planetpuna.com/hysonscorner/index.htm

More information may be found at:  www.theresonanceproject.org

By the way, Wikipedia has removed numerous people from their site for many reasons.  For example, they have removed Dr. Elizabeth Rauscher, who has some 250 publications, several books and several patents.  For this and other reasons, what Wikipedia accepts means very little.