Re: A critical thinking exercise.
Oh dear, again with the labeling. Your seeing my posts through your own skewed perception IC. I was using sarcasm, (something that you have used with others on many occasions), as I did not believe for a minute that your intentions were for innocent engagement. (and you proved my suspicions right in your very next post).
I agree with Hunters assessment, and as he lives in the UK, he often posts at this time, so there is nothing sinister in his timing. I always appreciate any support that people wish to give freely. I certainly don't consider myself a victim of any sort, and certainly not a victim of you, so I have no need to feign anything.
I don't believe you have a wider view of data, as you put it. I think you have a very narrow view, and are closed off to much of the data, because it doesn't suit your belief system. So no, I will not be seeking you out, I will however continue to view and assess what you post publicly.
spud