Re: Quackwatch???

I believe the source is important the support for Stephan Barret stood out like a sore thumb and should be a point of contention as to this sites validity. I think B&G started the emotional trigger any way , without reply he labels anyone who disagrees with him a sheep, this is quite a blatant trigger to start a post with.
The photos where nothing definitive as was implied by a fellow shill and it is quite obvious by looking at the source that they are not worth considering as valid. Nothing but a picture show.
Yet to date no one has convinced me that what I saw was not three buildings falling in the exact same manner as a planned professional demolition.
Tweet