Re: Input from others that have been here awhile

>>Funny thing, I'm thinking of adding that guy who has liver flukes and who did the flush and doing contact but was gonna ask if I should just do doctrine on him

Because there are so many different types of flukes, affecting different organs, you about have to run all the types if you are running frequencies yourself and doing it as a contact device. Or stay on top of it with dowsing to know what needs to be hit, and when. The other problem is--flukes also carry clostridiums and other bacterias, viruses and a host of other things too.

That's where I see as huge benefit of the doctrine running for people. What we wouldn't recognize is also involved, will be dealt with by the doctrine running. You can dowse time and again and see that happening.

It's kind of like the turtle and the hare too..slow and steady wins the race. If a person is not being run on the doctrine, immune reactions can be a nightmare! Ask best123 about his immune reactions to running some things as a contact device, not running the doctrine too. Not good.

People don't have to go through those severe reactions like that anymore, with the doctrine. Not that they aren't going to have reactions from things being addressed by the doctrine, but they are not going to be so horribly severe as the reactions were pre-doctrine.

The other thing is this..when we were hitting Brucella with my husband, not only did he have severe reactions, with other things also cropping up, but we had to stay on top of it and keep hitting it as it showed up..which was at least every other day.

If you run frequencies for a person with a contact device, are they willing to come and sit there as often as needed? Not likely.

I got the MS friend to come to the house once, and we tried the Schistosoma Mansoni (found in his brain) one time via contact device. Dowsing has shown that the doctrine really has worked for him, in ways I never could have done. Tweet