Re: Doctrine

The CZ friend that just got the F165/SC-1, is afraid to start running the doctrine until after a vacation the middle of the month, because of the fear of having reactions. Instead, they thought it might be best to just experiment with frequencies for hitting "mild" things that wouldn't cause reactions.

I don't think there are any "mild" things, depending upon what a person is infected with, and what is layered with it. "There is never just one cockroach".

Like best123 found out, he had a massive immune reaction that went on for days from running frequencies for cryptosporidium.

There are a number of benefits that are included in the doctrine, but the way I feel about it now is that not running it, is leaving yourself (and others you are running frequencies for) wide open for things we would never know how to deal with ourselves. Not just pathogens.
It could get pretty discouraging, dowsing through the list of Newport's frequency scripts, and realizing how much a person really did have going on when frequencies were having to be ran for each thing.

The doctrine is set up to only hit as many pathogens at one time as the body is able to handle it. That's pretty important if a person starts running frequencies for things like flukes, not realizing they can also be in the brain. Or killing a bunch of filarial type parasites with an already clogged lymph system. Frequencies in the doctrine are for other things than "kill", they are also for enzymes, and detox pathways too, and the uptake of metals/toxins.

Yes, people have had reactions from only running the doctrine, but with the built in safe guards, how much worse could it have been by running the frequencies without the doctrine, and not knowing to also address the other things that go with it too. Herpes family viruses, retroviruses, bacterias (for example). Tweet