So, you have no evidence

"I don't keep the records but, while I know of no one dying from a Liver Flush it's a fact--lots of people die from surgery complications. So without hesitation I stand by my statement, "Doctor's knifes kill more people than liver flushing! "

That's comparing apples to oranges. You can't say that one method is better than another just because method 2 shows some deaths -- when method one has no records at all!

We might agree on many things, but making unsubstantiated statements is not one of them.

How do you know what you know? Just because you have not heard of Liver Flush deaths, doesn't mean there aren't any. WOuld you have heard of surgical deaths if they did not keep records at hospitals?

Your statement MIGHT be true, but right now all you have is conjecture. This is just the kind of thinking that gives holistic medicine a bad name. Much better to keep some records.
©†ƒ……•™¼‡_Original_Message_¾€š½ž¢«»¬ï°©

"I don't keep the records but, while I know of no one dying from a Liver Flush it's a fact--lots of people die from surgery complications. So without hesitation I stand by my statement, "Doctor's knifes kill more people than liver flushing! "

That's comparing apples to oranges. You can't say that one method is better than another just because method 2 shows some deaths -- when method one has no records at all!

Your statement MIGHT be true, but right now all you have is conjecture. This is just the kind of thinking that gives holistic medicine a bad name. Much better to keep some records.