Do you have evidence to support all your statements?

"You sound like an MD looking to ease your guilt!"

I am not an MD, and I have no guilt on this topic. I am not in the health or medical field at all. I am just a person who developed a gall bladder problem, with no previous symptoms, AFTER using the Liver Flush as a way to improve overall health, as touted on this site.

I am not a fan of western medicine at all. But to claim that it is more risky than anything else isn't really fair. Western medicine is pretty good at some things, pretty bad at others. For example, while I might go to a holistic healer for chronic backaches, I would not want a holistic healer to treat me after a bad car accident -- I'd rather take my chances with a top surgeon and ER team. Don't throw out the baby with the bath water.

"Doctor's knifes kill more people than liver flushing! "

Can you prove that statement? People who might learn of the Liver Flush on this forum, try it, and die from Liver Flushing don't have an opportunity to re-post on this forum after they're dead, to let us know that they died.... What statistics do you have on liver flushers?

My point in posting that link to the person who had the horrific experience with Liver Flushing is in answer to the person's question who asked about whether there are any potential risks with Liver Flushing. While this forum overall seems to indicate that there are not risks to liver flushing, that it may just be a little uncomfortable but will always produce good results in the end, that is not necessarily the case. Its only fair to people considering doing this that they make an informed decision, with the pros and cons of BOTH approaches.