Re:Hunza's

If we are going to talk logic then in analytics there has to be a defined baseline before any data can be extrapolated collated or projected. That is why the dictionary was brought in. In doing so a baseline was attempted at defining a concept of morality. If a baseline can't be agreed upon then logic and analysis has to be thrown out and this has to be recognized as a pure philosophical argument. Any astute theology student recognizes the circular argument of "the bible is true because it says it is". Yet even thought the argument of a moral relativist is not circular it is a broken argument. For if there is no defined baseline for morality. Who can say that everything that Hitler did was in his own eyes the utmost in moral behavior. Without this baseline no one can say it was not moral.