Re: Interesting

 >>"Interesting how you all of a sudden require evidence. Tell all of us did you ever demand evidence of Moreless' claims?"<<

Anyone who has followed me here for any number of years knows I researched the he!! out of ML's claims... no, I did not ask him for any proof... I saught it on my own.

So maybe you would like to explain what electomagnetic energy is being released from the drink then? And exactly how this EM energy benefits the body? I would love to see what evidence you have to support the drink. While you are at it, since the idea of the drink is to alkalinize the lymphatic fluids where is the evidence that the lymphatic fluids are acidic from disease.

>>"Especially after it was proven over and over that he was full of it?"<<

His explanations are cryptic and rather vague... that does not make him "full of it".

OK, simple question. Yes or no, is it safe for a person with hemachromatosis to take blackstrap molasses as Moreless claims is safe? Don't try to talk around the question or justify it. That is why I said "yes or no". And don't forget my question above about the lymphatic system. I would also like to see proof of Moreless' other claims like nitrogen is a protein and ammonia is an isotope. If Moreless is not full of it then it should be easy to provide evidence to these claims. I have been researching science for a very long time yet I never heard any of these except for from Moreless.

he brought up problems with NPN's that are in the news almost daily.

You mean NPNs like amino acids that we need for all sorts of things like tissue formation, hormone formation, neurotransmitter formation, etc.? Or maybe the NPN creatine needed for the production of muscle energy? Or maybe the NPN uric acid, which is part of the body's primary antioxidant system? Yes I see how those can be dangerous and should be avoided, LOL!!!!

>>"If not then why are you all of a sudden asking someone to verify a claim when you did not require the same of someone who was making up their "facts" as they went along?"<<

A personal testimony claim whether good or bad requires some bit of proof... a statement about this or that "fact" in Science can be researched.

So where is the proof to any of the testimonials from the ML site? Or is this again something only required of everyone else, but not Moreless and his followers?

Let me tell you a little story. You promote the use of Yucca root on your forum... my mom is a huge fan of yucca root and I tried it for a while... inside of the FIRST week, my calves and feet were painfully swelling up at night... quit the yucca root, everything almost back to normal within a week; edema gone. I have not countered any of your posts recommending it with my negative experience... when perhaps it would be beneficial for them to know.

Yes, anything comes with potential adverse effects. With yucca the risks are allergies as with anything, hemolysis if contacting blood such as a bleeding ulcer, and a laxative effect if taken in high doses. Those are the only known side effects. Other than the potential for a strong allergic reaction the other side effects are not that critical.  Drinking caustic calcium hydroxide on the other hand is a different story.  Here we have a product that CLEARLY states on the bag to avoid contact with skin or other tissues. And he is telling people to drink this crap. And yes, some of it is being neutralized by the citric acid, but without a pH meter how are people supposed to know when all the caustic hydroxide is neutralized? Why not just start with calcium citrate to avoid the risk?

We need to keep this all in perspective and understand that one man's poison, is another man's food.

Yes, I realize that. On the other hand to claim that this protocol is a cure all and safe for everyone including those with hypercalcemia, hemochromatosis, polycythemia, etc. is total crap!!!