Good points, but hard to debate the real world results nevertheless

OK - I just found your post and you make some very good points which I will forward to the person who designed the Sutherlandia OPC and helped design and conduct the study.

But let me make one point that you are likely not aware of:  This study came about only after several hundreds of HIV/AIDS patients used Marc Swanepoel's OPC formula with 100% success over the last four plus years.  As far as Mr. Swanepoel is aware of, not one single patient has failed to have their HIV symptoms reversed and STAY reversed during the past four years.  That would include many hundreds of people over much, much longer periods than the 60 days of the trial.  And, unlike me, you also do not have the benefit of knowing how well the OPC has performed with cancer patients either.  While we can debate the study based on your observations - it is awfully hard to debate real world results.

Personally, if I had HIV/AIDS, and if someone I knew and trusted completely told me that they had a herbal supplement that had never failed to reverse HIV in several hundred or more people over the past four years and that every single patient was still alive and doing well, and if I had personal experience with how well the OPC performed with cancer, it would be a no-brainer for me as to what I would take.  And it certainly would not be any FDA approved drug or treatment.

Again though, you pose some interesting questions and I will do my best to obtain answers or responses.

Peace,

DQ (Tony Isaacs)