Re: help cancer!

First, I will state an old adage "The bit dog howls first".

That aside, I really consider several of your claims to be unreasonable but I will only touch on the following.

>- to say that it has never cured cancer is one of your many lies that you post on curezone.

I must disagree with you. Tony is correct, chemo or radiation may kill a tumor but it does not cure the cancer and there is a big difference.

>- When someone whose very close relative with cancer states on this forum that their loved one is going to go for chemo and radiation (over which they have no control) and you make a statement like you did - you have no business posting on this forum.

Actually, while you may not agree with his statement, that is exactly what these forums are here for. They are to promote open discussion of pro's and con's of any cancer therapy. Those who feel that they have good results from chemo may post here, but again just like anything else, it is only anecdotal.

>- resort to some poison called oleander

While the Oleander plant does contain poisons, these poisons can be diluted or extracted out which is what Oleander soup is designed to do. This is exactly what the FDA claims about black salve and amygdalin (laetrile). BS! (bad science?)

>- I pointed to Essiac over and over again (in another thread), along with Pau d'arco

I agree with you in regards to Essiac but must remain neutral on Pau d'arco.

So, what does the ACS think?

From their site re Pau d'arco: "available evidence from well-designed, controlled studies has not supported this substance as an effective treatment for cancer in humans. Pau d'arco also has potentially dangerous side effects."

From their site re Essiac: "available scientific evidence does not support its use for the treatment of cancer in humans."

Tony may not be experienced with either Pau d'arco or Essiac and would not comment on these if so.

Otherwise, I believe that I have made my point in regards to the negative attitude of the ACS.
Tweet