Related Links:
Now that we're right in the middle of winter, it's time to revisit vitamin D. But this time, let's look at it from another perspective - your skin type.
I don't know if your skin is pale white or a dark black. But it makes a difference. Researchers have devised a scale to evaluate skin types. The scale is called the Fitzpatrick scale. It classifies skin like this:
* Type 1 is fair and always burns, never tans.
* Type 3 is darker white skin that burns and tans
* Type 5 is brown skin that rarely burns, tans easily, etc.
Researchers used these skin types in a recent study. They wanted to know how long it would take each skin type to produce 400-1,000 IU of vitamin D from the sun. They had participants stand naked from the waist up at different times and in different cities. Here's what they found: If you're a type 3, you would need only six minutes in the summer and 15 minutes in the winter at noon in Miami. If you're type 5, you'd need 15 and 29 minutes respectively. In Boston, in midsummer, you could match Miami at noon. But in winter, it would take about one hour for type-3 skin and two hours for type-5 skin to make 1,000 IU of vitamin D. After 2:00 p.m. in the winter in Boston, it's impossible for even someone with Fitzpatrick type-1 skin to receive enough sun for his body to make even 400 IU of vitamin D. Some in orthodox medicine will tell you simply to get outdoors. Well, it's clear that you could stand naked all day in Boston in the winter, freezing your .... off, and even if you have a dark skin type, all you would do is freeze your .... off. And, chances are, you spend little time outdoors in Boston's winter anyway. Please don't take chances with vitamin D. It easy to get, cheap, highly effective, and can protect your bones, immune system, circulatory system, and nervous system. All in one little supplement. I find at least half my patients deficient in vitamin D when I test their blood. My recommended dose is 5,000 IU daily. Advanced Bionutritionals carries an excellent form of vitamin D3 made from sheep lanolin, which vegetarians can take. I take it every day! Yours for better health and medical freedom,
Robert J. Rowen, MD
Ref: J Clin Endocrinol Metab., 2007; 92:2130.
If you'd like to receive your own Second Opinion Health Alert, please sign up:
http://www.SecondOpinionNewsletter.com
Did you know that eating just two ounces of raw almonds can provide you with the minimum recommended daily allowance of vitamin E (15 mg, or 22 IU)? It's true. But for better health, you should try to obtain at least 200 IU of vitamin E each day. So, in addition to almonds, be sure to eat a variety of other foods rich in vitamin E, such as green leafy vegetables, broccoli, asparagus, green peas, lima beans, and sweet potatoes.
To read this The Health Plus Letter in it's entirety click here
The Health Plus Letter, June 16, 2009, Vol. 7, No. 15. Copyright © 2009 by Larry Trivieri, Jr. All rights reserved.
Many people take vitamin and mineral supplements in hopes of reducing their risk for heart disease, cancer and other degenerative diseases, and some research does supports those hopes. But several recent large long-term studies have found that supplements work no better than placebos.
Ever since the Nobel Prize-winning biochemist Linus Pauling first promoted “megadoses” of essential nutrients 40 years ago, Americans have been devoted to their vitamins. Today about half of all adults use some form of dietary supplement, at a cost of $23 billion a year.
But are vitamins worth it? Recently several high-quality studies have failed to show that extra vitamins, at least in pill form, help prevent chronic disease or prolong life.
The most recent news came earlier this year after researchers in the Women’s Health Initiative study tracked eight years of multivitamin use among more than 161,000 older women. Despite earlier findings suggesting that multivitamins might lower the risk for heart disease and certain cancers, the study, published in The Archives of Internal Medicine, found no such benefit.
Last year, a study that tracked almost 15,000 male physicians for a decade reported no differences in cancer or heart disease rates among those using vitamins E and C compared with those taking a placebo. And in October, a study of 35,000 men dashed hopes that high doses of vitamin E and selenium could lower the risk of prostate cancer.
Everyone needs vitamins, which are essential nutrients that the body can’t produce on its own. Inadequate vitamin C leads to scurvy, for instance, and a lack of vitamin D can cause rickets.
Most major vitamin studies in recent years, however, have not focused on deficiencies but on whether high doses of vitamins can prevent or treat a host of chronic illnesses. While people who eat lots of nutrient-rich fruits and vegetables have long been known to have lower rates of heart disease and cancer, it hasn’t been clear whether ingesting high doses of nutrients in pill form results in a similar benefit.
In January, an editorial in The Journal of the National Cancer Institute noted that most trials had shown no cancer benefits from vitamins — with a few exceptions, like a finding that calcium appeared to lower the recurrence of precancerous colon polyps by 15 percent.
But some vitamin studies have also shown unexpected harm, like higher lung cancer rates in two studies of beta carotene use. Another study suggested a higher risk of precancerous polyps among users of folic acid compared with those in a placebo group.
In 2007, The Journal of the American Medical Association reviewed mortality rates in randomized trials of antioxidant supplements. In 47 trials of 181,000 participants, the rate was 5 percent higher among the antioxidant users. The main culprits were vitamin A, beta carotene, and vitamin E. Vitamin C and selenium seemed to have no meaningful effect.
“We call them essential nutrients because they are,” said Marian L. Neuhouser, an associate member in cancer prevention at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle. “But there has been a leap into thinking that vitamins and minerals can prevent anything from fatigue to cancer to Alzheimer’s. That’s where the Science didn’t pan out.”
Everyone is struggling to make sense of the conflicting data, said Andrew Shao, vice president for scientific and regulatory affairs at the Council for Responsible Nutrition, a vitamin industry trade group. Consumers and researchers need to “redefine our expectations for these nutrients,” he said. “They aren’t magic bullets.”
Part of the problem, he said, may stem from an inherent flaw in the way vitamins are studied. With drugs, the gold standard for research is a randomized clinical trial in which some patients take a drug and others a placebo. But vitamins are essential nutrients that people ingest in their daily diets; there is no way to withhold them altogether from research subjects.
The selling point of antioxidant vitamins is that they mop up free radicals, the damaging molecular fragments linked to aging and disease. But some free radicals are essential to proper immune function, and wiping them out may inadvertently cause harm.
“Most antioxidants are also pro-oxidants,” said Dr. Peter H. Gann, professor and director of research in the department of pathology at the University of Illinois at Chicago. “In the right context and the right dose, they may be able to cause problems rather than prevent them.”
Scientists suspect that the benefits of a healthful diet come from eating the whole fruit or vegetable, not just the individual vitamins found in them. “There may not be a single component of broccoli or green leafy vegetables that is responsible for the health benefits,” Dr. Gann said. “Why are we taking a reductionist approach and plucking out one or two chemicals given in isolation?”
We know that vitamins are essential to good health and can prevent disease. We also know that vitamin supplementation is useful in preventing and treating numerous diseases. The real question is: How beneficial are vitamin supplements in preventing chronic conditions like heart disease and cancer?
Study after study has demonstrated the benefit of whole foods, rich in vitamins and minerals in preventing disease, including those of the heart and
circulatory system. Supplements, however, may not be as good as real food. One of the problems with dietary supplements is that they often contain synthetic vitamins which are not the same as natural vitamins. Although they may look similar and have similar physiological effects, they are not identical. Therefore, their effects are not identical. So the synthetic vitamins may be less effective at protecting against certain health conditions.
Processed foods are not a good source of vitamins and minerals even if they are "fortified."
Another shortcoming with synthetic vitamins is that they are isolated nutrients. Vitamins in foods are never isolated, but occur with dozens, if not hundreds of other vitamins, minerals, and nutrients. All of which, work synergistically together. For example, vitamin E is not simply one vitamin, but consists of a family of eight vitamins. Dietary supplements usually contain only one form of vitamin E. Foods, however, contain mixtures of all eight forms. While each form of vitamin E is similar in structure, they each have their own characteristics and affect the body differently. Each of these forms of vitamin E provides benefit. When combined they provide the greatest protection against heart disease and other conditions. But when isolated, that protection may seriously decline or even disappear. The same is true with vitamin C. In nature vitamin C is always associated with bioflavonoids. They work synergistically together. It is no wonder then, when studies use isolated nutrients the results are unimpressive. Foods contain hundreds of nutrients that work together for your health. Dietary supplements contain only a few.
Some vitamins may become toxic when taken in isolation from other nutrients. For example, vitamin D, an essential nutrient, can become toxic at high doses. But when combined with vitamin A, the toxicity level plumpest rapidly. Vitamins D and A work synergistically together to provide many health benefits’ but too much of one without the other can lead to problems. This may explain why some studies have shown detrimental effects with large doses of beta-carotene and vitamin A. This is only seen in dietary supplements. Vitamins from whole foods do not cause these problems.
What we can learn from these studies is that eating isolated nutrients does not guarantee good health. Many people tend to think that if they take a vitamin and mineral supplement that it gives them an excuse to make poor eating choices. It doesn’t. Eating a bowl of Lucky Charms breakfast cereal, which is fortified with several vitamins and minerals, is not a nutritious breakfast! Likewise, white “enriched” bread is not the same as eating whole wheat bread. Vitamins don’t make up for a poor diet or for highly processed, nutrient deficient foods. Dietary supplements are just that—supplements, not food. The only way you can get all the protective vitamins and minerals you need to be healthy, is from real foods.
References:
Sesso, H.D., et al. Vitamins E and C in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in men: the Physicians’ Health Study II randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;300(18):2123-2133.
Lippman, S.M., et al. Effect of selenium and vitamin E on risk of prostate cancer and other cancers. JAMA. 2009;301(1):39-51.
Neuhouser, M.L. Multivitamin use and risk kof cancer and cardiovascular disease in Woman’s Health Initiative cohorts. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(3):294-304.
To read this article or subscribe to Healthy Ways Newsletter, click here
Copyright © 2009, Bruce Fife. All rights reserved. Do you have friends who would like this newsletter? If so, please feel free to share this newsletter with them.
My morning run today was a little chilly...
But, I really can't complain.
My mom is watching snow come down in Connecticut.
Fifty degree weather in Florida is nothing to complain about. :-)
Today, I want to continue my discussion on plant based sources of essential nutrients.
So we've covered the protein deal.
Bottomline: You can get plenty of protein from plants.
Next up is iron.
There's a misconception that you can't get sufficient iron from plant based sources.
It's flatly just not true.
You can.
A perfect example is Annmarie.
She's always had low iron, but on her last blood test her iron levels had reached normal levels.
This is without any red meat.
She used to have to take nasty iron supplements that made her breath smell when she was younger.
Now, nothing. Just plants.
And her iron levels are fine.
There are plenty of others with a similar story who've adopted a high raw diet.
And get this...
When I was in college I was diagnosed with hemochromatosis.
An overabundance and inability to rid the body of iron.
This is an incurable "disease" that is only regulated by donating blood every month to keep your iron levels down (basically modern day bloodletting).
More than a decade later, there is no trace of this "disease."
Are you getting the picture here?
There's some misinformation about iron here that needs to be addressed.
:-)
So where can you get iron from plant sources?
We all know spinach in your smoothies and juices will help.
But also fennel.
Fennel is a great addition to a smoothie or juice to sweeten it up and give you an iron boost.
Another great source is that same superfood I talked about yesterday...
Spirulina.
Spirulina is 58 times richer in organic iron than raw spinach and 28 times richer than raw beef liver!
Mmmm... beef liver.
Good thing we have spirulina. :-)
You can mix this superfood into your water in the morning or blend it in smoothies or...
You can use Spirulina Crunchies on your salad or eat 'em straight with a spoon.
If you're interested in trying them out, here's where you can go:
http://store.renegadehealth.com/Spirulina-Crunchies-4-oz-p131.html
So now you're armed with a little "ammunition" when someone questions what you're doing.
Keep strong.
Be smart.
Get your blood tested.
Eat plants.
You'll be alright.
Live Awesome!
Kev
Green tea is one of the best known supplements in the world. It has been touted for everything from weight loss to cancer prevention to longevity. It's used by serious herbalists (who actually understand it), and it's used in some of the most basic formulas in the world such as One A Day WeightSmart, albeit at meaningless pixie dust levels. But more to the point, it's back in the news with the release of a new study that shows it may actually help slow the progression of prostate cancer. But this newsletter isn't about the virtues of green tea, although we will explore them. Instead, it's about some of the shenanigans going on behind the scenes concerning not just green tea, but all supplements, and even some basic vitamins – specifically B6.
But first, let's talk about some of the virtues of green tea as demonstrated in clinical studies.
The biochemicals of health in green tea
Green tea antioxidants are of the same family as grape seed and pine bark extracts. They are polyphenols, chief of which are the flavonoids called proanthocyanidins. In green tea, the main proanthocyanidins are the catechins, and the most powerful of the catechins is Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG), found in the high concentrations in green tea. Why don't other teas have similar properties – particularly since many of them come from the same plant, Camellia sinensis? Quite simply, what sets green tea apart is the way it is processed. Green tea leaves are lightly fermented and steamed, which prevents the EGCG compound from being oxidized. By contrast, black and oolong tea leaves are made from heavily fermented leaves, which results in the EGCG being converted into other compounds that are not as effective in preventing and fighting various diseases.
And while on the topic of green tea, I should probably mention its lesser known sibling, white tea. The main difference between white and green tea is that white tea leaves are harvested at a younger age than the green tea leaves. It should be noted that white tea actually trumps green tea in several ways. First, whereas green tea is lightly fermented, white tea is totally unfermented leaving even more of the EGCG intact. Second, studies have shown that the young, white tea leaves retain antioxidants in higher concentrations than does green tea. In fact, the concentration of antioxidants in white tea is approximately three times higher than in green tea. Bottom line: anything we say about the health benefits of green tea also apply to white tea, but even more so.
Note: if you drink your tea (as opposed to taking a supplement), adding cream or milk to the tea "may" destroy the antioxidant benefits (1, 2, 3). Although the studies are conflicting, it's probably best to err on the side of caution. The studies are far less conflicted when it comes to milk reducing the antioxidant potential found in dark chocolate. The mechanism is simple. The caseins in the dairy interact with the polyphenols in the tea or chocolate and decrease their effectiveness. Then again, if you use a concentrated, full-spectrum green tea extract, you avoid the problem altogether.
Green tea health benefits
As I mentioned earlier, the reported benefits of green tea are multitudinous…and well studied. For example, green tea inhibits tumor growth in a variety of cancers, including: breast, lung, and prostate cancers. Specifically, the EGCG in green tea works to suppress angiogenesis, the growth of blood vessels that tumors need to survive. And if that's not enough -- stopping the growth of cancer at the front end -- green tea polyphenols have been shown to inhibit metastasis, the spread of cancer at the back end. And finally, EGCG is the first known natural telomerase inhibitor. That is to say, it eliminates the "immortality" of cancer cells which is their trademark and which makes them so deadly. The bottom line is that green tea is particularly effective in destroying the causes of leukemia, prostate cancer, breast cancer, and seems to provide the best protection known in terms of preventing lung cancer. And green tea seems to be able to almost totally prevent cancer causing DNA damage in smokers -- a possible explanation as to why the Japanese, who are among the world's heaviest smokers, have such a low incidence of lung cancer.
And the benefits of green tea don't stop there. It has also been shown to be effective in regulating blood sugar, reducing cholesterol and triglycerides, and in reversing the ravages of heart disease. (Incidentally, the Japanese, who drink large amounts of green tea, have some of the lowest rates of cardiovascular disease in the world.)
And finally, green tea has great benefits for the brain as well. It serves as an effective MAO inhibitor. It also protects against brain-cell death from glucose oxidase, over-production of nitric oxide, and it lowers the amount of free iron reaching the brain (a bad thing). The net result is that there are strong indications that green tea extract may play a major role in protecting against both Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease.
Green tea slows prostate cancer
Now let's turn to the study in the news that triggered this newsletter. The headlines started making the media rounds a couple of weeks ago, "Green tea slows prostate cancer." In summary, according to the results of a study published in Cancer Prevention Research, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, men with prostate cancer who consumed the active compounds in a green tea extract demonstrated a significant reduction in serum markers predictive of prostate cancer progression.
"The investigational agent used in the trial, Polyphenon E (provided by Polyphenon Pharma), may have the potential to lower the incidence and slow the progression of prostate cancer," said James A. Cardelli, Ph.D., professor and director of basic and translational research in the Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, LSU Health Sciences Center-Shreveport.
The study included 26 men, aged 41 to 72 years, diagnosed with prostate cancer and scheduled for radical prostatectomy. Patients consumed four capsules containing Polyphenon E until the day before surgery – four capsules are equivalent to about 12 cups of normally brewed concentrated green tea, according to Cardelli. The time of study for 25 of the 26 patients ranged from 12 days to 73 days, with a median time of 34.5 days.
Findings showed a significant reduction in serum levels of HGF, VEGF and PSA after treatment (HGF and VEGF are good prognostic indicators of metastatic disease), with some patients demonstrating reductions in levels of greater than 30 percent, according to the researchers.
Cardelli and his colleagues found that other biomarkers were also positively affected. There were only a few reported side effects associated with this study, and liver function remained normal. Said Cardelli, "There is reasonably good evidence that many cancers are preventable, and our studies using plant-derived substances support the idea that plant compounds found in a healthy Diet can play a role in preventing cancer development and progression."
The Polyphenon E curve ball
So what is this miracle antioxidant Polyphenon E found in green tea and used in the study? Well, according to the National Cancer Institute, Polyphenon E "is a substance being studied in the prevention of cancer. It is made from decaffeinated green tea, and contains chemicals called catechins, which are antioxidants." And according to its manufacturer, Mitsui Norin Co., Ltd., Polyphenon is a highly purified tea catechin extract, and is going to be the first pharmaceutical grade green tea catechin in the world.
That sounds pretty amazing…and pretty unique. The reality, however, is a tad less dramatic. The Polyphenon E used in the prostate study came in a 416.7 mg capsule with a breakdown as follows: 200 mg EGCG, 48.5 mg EGC, 34.2 mg EC, 20 mg ECG, and other tea catechins, 28.8 mg pregelatinized starch, 2.25 mg colloidal silicon dioxide, and 2.25 mg magnesium stearate. In other words, there's nothing particularly special about Polyphenon E. It's a fairly standard mix of green tea catechins. And as far as being "pharmaceutical grade," green tea extracts now come standardized to 95-98 percent polyphenol content. That's about as pharmaceutical grade as you're going to get.
So, does it matter that tests were being conducted using a standardized green tea extract with a registered trademark for a name and that the National Cancer Institute is singling out for special attention?
And the answer in this case is, "Yes, big time!"
The FDA seeks to outlaw pyridoxamine (vitamin B6)
Your first thought might be, "How could it matter?" Lots of companies trademark names of ingredients. Heck, I've done it with some of my formulations. But in those cases, you're just talking about marketing differentiation. But with Polyphenon E, you have a whole different ballgame.
First, think about the status of green tea in the world. It's only known side effect is that it might make it more difficult for you to sleep if you took too much of it too close to bedtime. In exchange for this minor effect, you get all of the benefits cited above (cancer, heart disease, longevity, etc.), all demonstrated in study after study after study. In point of fact, you would be hard pressed to find a single drug in the world that has so few side effects and so many benefits and so many studies to back it up. Even the so-called miracle drug, aspirin, is not as clean. Remember, the smallest dosage of aspirin causes internal bleeding.
And yet, given green tea's remarkable safety record and proven benefits, not a word of these benefits can be mentioned in connection with any product being sold that contains green tea -- not in the US, not in Europe, not anywhere. And yet, Polyphenon E is being pitched as a potential cancer cure all over the internet and in medical literature. It even has a featured position on the Prostate Cancer Foundation website. How can this be?
Perhaps we can find the answer by looking at the curious case of pyridoxamine – the only form of B6 that can be taken without fear of peripheral neuropathy, and the only form, according to some experts, that should ever be used in supplements. And yet, given all this, pharmaceutical interests have filed a petition with the FDA seeking to ban the use of pyridoxamine in supplements. And the FDA is seriously considering it. Why? Because pyridoxamine has shown promise in protecting against diabetic complications! According to the FDA, if low cost pyridoxamine was available in supplements, there would be no incentive for the pharmaceutical industry to invest the money necessary to get it classified as a prescription drug! In other words, if there is enough money involved, the FDA is quite willing to reclassify everyday supplements as pharmaceutical drugs.
For a more detailed look at this issue, check out William Faloon's article in the most recent issue of Life Extension Magazine. But for now, let's cut to the heart of the matter.
The green tea squeeze play
When it comes to herbs and supplements, governments all over the world do everything in their power to prevent you from ever seeing any information at all that might indicate they offer any real health benefits. But like Catch 22, they catch you coming and going.
• If you can't prove the benefits to their satisfaction (and how much more do we need to see on the benefits of
green tea), you can't talk about the benefits because they would amount to unsubstantiated health claims.
• On the other hand, if you can prove the benefits, you can't sell the supplements because they would no
longer be supplements. They would be drugs and therefore too valuable to be left in the hands of anyone but
the pharmaceutical companies.
• Damned if you do. Damned if you don't.
So is there any way out of this conundrum? Absolutely! Just join the club – aka, the pharmaceutical industry. And get your supplement classified as pharmaceutical grade. Then you can make all the health claims you want, and charge 600% more for essentially the same supplement. This appears to be the route that Mitsui Norin Co., Ltd has chosen to follow. And who gets hurt by this squeeze play? Only you, the consumer!
You're denied mountains of information on a plethora of supplements that can potentially save your life. Or you're forced to pay many times over the actual cost to get an "officially sanctioned" version of the same supplement that actually comes with information.
Over the years, I've sounded off repeatedly on how the alternative health community continually gets itself hung up on the pinstripes of major legislation that is highly, highly unlikely to ever pass -- all the while missing the true threat to health and nutrition, the co-option that goes on in the background…without the requirement of any legislation being signed.
You are witnessing that co-option as a potential walk-off home run with pyridoxamine -- and as a squeeze play in the making with green tea and Polyphenon E.
Like this natural health newsletter? Sign up for our free bi-monthly newsletter and every time a newsletter is released you'll get it in your email inbox! Keep up to date with the latest in health and learn how to better your mind and body! Click here to sign-up for our Alternative Health Newsletter!
By: Jon Barron
Invariably, once people are exposed to the Baseline of Health® program, they begin to notice that each formula seems to produce multiple "miracles." For example, within days of being released, we were already getting reports that our brain tonic formula seemed to dramatically relieve everything from asthma to schizophrenia to hangovers -- not to mention the improved mental clarity that it was designed for. How can this be? Is this imagination run wild? Not at all. The key is that most of the formulas in the Baseline of Health® program are actually mini "Baselines of Health" in and of themselves. By that, I mean that since we use whole herbs and whole nutritional complexes in our formulas, we get the benefit of the entire package -- not just the targeted benefit we designed the formula for. Since I've already mentioned our brain tonic formula, let's stick with that for a moment (although the same holds true for all of the Baseline of Health® formulas). One of the ingredients in the brain tonic is periwinkle. We used periwinkle because it contains vinpocetine, a proven brain enhancer. But above and beyond vinpocetine, periwinkle contains a motherlode of useful phytochemicals (70 in all at last count). Some, such as catharanthine, leurosine sulphate, lochnerine, tetrahydroalstonine, vindoline and vindolinine lower blood Sugar levels (thus easing the symptoms of diabetes). Others such as reserpine and serpentine are powerful tranquilizers. Still other alkaloids present in periwinkle lower blood pressure; and others act as hemostatics (arrest bleeding). And two others, vincristine and vinblastine, have anticancer properties. (In fact, there are probably at least six alkaloids in periwinkle with anti-cancer properties. Note: some of the alkaloids in periwinkle can have powerful side effects in their isolated form. That's why we use the whole herb, and it's why we use a controlled amount of periwinkle in the brain tonic -- to avoid the possibility of side effects.) For the moment though, let's continue to look at some of the anti-cancer properties inherent in the brain tonic. In addition to periwinkle, the brain tonic also contains rosemary leaf. Research has shown that rosemary extracts inhibit the initiation of carcinogenesis. The phytochemicals in rosemary act by stimulating enzymes in the body that are capable of neutralizing the activity of carcinogenic substances. These substances are then no longer able to attack cell DNA, which is the primary target in the cancer process. The brain tonic also contains d-limonene (a terpene), which has been proven in several studies to have powerful anti-cancer properties. For example, Researchers at the University of Wisconsin found that when d-limonene was added to the diets of rats who had developed tumors, the tumors disappeared completely in some 90% of them. In a related study, animals that were given d-limonene one hour before being exposed to known carcinogens, were protected from the effects of the carcinogens at a highly significant rate. In human trials, limonene has been used with great effect in England as a monotherapy for individuals with pancreatic and large intestine cancer. So, does this mean that I recommend using brain tonic to self-medicate for cancer? No, absolutely not. The formula wasn't designed as a cancer treatment; the proportions of the ingredients weren't optimized for that benefit; and cancer is ultimately a systemic problem anyway, not amenable to a magic bullet approach. On the other hand, will I be surprised if we hear testimonials down the road telling us how someone with cancer (or diabetes or MS or asthma or whatever) experienced some dramatic benefits by using the brain tonic -- or men's testosterone formula or carnosine formula or any of the other Baseline formulas? Not at all. It's merely the expected result of treating the body as a whole and using high-quality natural substances in their unrefined form. In the end, what you have is a fairly mundane explanation for consistently miraculous results.
Some believe that the planet is headed for great upheaval.
If so, we're gonna need "new" skills.
"Surthrival" isn't just about surviving, but doing it with style.
Conscious Shift Revolution present: 3 day Self Reliance Mastery Course entitled: Wilderness Sur-Thrival 3-day Intensive. Find out why it is crucial at this time to learn the skills of Self Reliant Living on the practical, psychological and spiritual level.
http://consciousrevolution.ning.com
2005 shoot of survival instructor Cody Lundin's self-designed, passive solar earth home in the remote high desert of Arizona.
Live the Way of Permaculture
(NaturalNews) Permaculture is a way of living; it involves sustainability, ethics, community living, harmony with nature, appropriate technology, organic living, organic farming, etc. It is a way to integrate nature and people in the most sustainable way. This word, permaculture (that was originally derived from permanent agriculture), was originally coined by two Australians named David Holmgren and Bill Mollison in response to the challenges related to our survival.
In permaculture, ethics and design principles are used to help us make good decisions for the people and the environment. Permaculture itself is an ethical design system and can be applied to both the home and the community. Also it can be applied in rural and urban areas. Permaculture also involves three aspects which can be briefly described as follow:
Care for the land: Actions to protect the environment and improve it. Earth should be seen as a whole.
Care for the people: It involves the physical and psychological aspects, for example providing food and shelter, natural medications, reduce daily hard work, and provide equal opportunities for all people.
Care for the future: It is very important if we want to conserve our resources. Some of the aspects that it involves are recycling, planning, cooperation not competition, supporting local economy, and the use of renewable energy and resources.
The application of permaculture concepts helps us in reducing costs if we implement different alternatives that allow us to maximize efficiency and production. For example you can plant vegetables in an area where water drains from the sink (as long as you use biodegradable dish washing soaps that are harmless to the plants), this way reducing your plant watering time. While using this concept you save time that you can use for other tasks or for recreation, this way increasing your quality of life.
When working with permaculture you apply also design principles. For example, you can start plotting what you originally have in your home (for example recreational areas, gardens, unused areas, etc.); then, you can make changes in your drawing for the desired areas according to your ideas. For example, you can take into consideration the times when the sun rises and falls so you can plant according to the intensity of the sun received in the area. Also, you can verify which areas are the best for planting different kinds of vegetables, and then strategically locate the plants.
In permaculture design, zones are used to specify the areas where you are going to accommodate plants, animals, recreational areas, etc. These zones can be identified with numbers, for example from 0 to 5, and can be thought as concentric circles, each one representing a zone where the first one can be used for the area that is more concurrent, like the house. The last zone can be used for the least used area, this way maximizing efficiency and production.
When we practice permaculture we are building a natural capital that yields benefits for today and for the future.
Following is a list of videos and resources related to permaculture:
For definitions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permaculture
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zones_%28permaculture%29
Free PDF downloads:
http://home.comcast.net/~billgile/site/?/blog/view/1/
http://www.idepfoundation.org/idep_downloads.html
Videos from youtube.com:
Permaculture Principles at Work
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lT_2VVXA7SY&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fna...
How To Survive The Economic Crisis: Permaculture With Bill Mollison Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XaRaKDeJuQ&feature=PlayList&...
How To Survive The Economic Crisis: Permaculture With Bill Mollison Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2x4Ytg_Lis&feature=PlayList&...
How To Survive The Economic Crisis: Permaculture With Bill Mollison Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzazYDbU7Mc&feature=PlayList&...
Towards Permaculture Centers Worldwide
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qI7nRoT142Y&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fna...
Articles:
http://naturalfreechoice.com/?q=node/23
http://permaculture.org.au/2009/05/01/each-step-is-the-way-part-i/
http://permaculture.org.au/2009/06/11/a-better-way-of-making-a-living/
http://kjpermaculture.blogspot.com/2009/03/farm-for-future.html#
About the author
Yamila Esther Gonzalez
http://www.naturalfreechoice.com
Subscribe to this FREE email newsletter
Live the Way of Permaculture
Daniel Vitalis, founder of Elixir Craft, offers practical tips and profound insights about the topics of preparing for planetary changes. Conscious Shift Revolution is an online community leveraging intention, knowledge and resources to respond with upcoming planetary shifts and realign with Natures laws.
Dr. Hunninghake's Experience with Vitamin C for Cancer and Infectious Diseases
Why is Vitamin C Not a Widely Adopted Treatment Strategy?
Administration Methods and Dosage Recommendations
Check for G6PD Deficiency Before Starting I.V. Vitamin C
What You Need to Know About Oral Vitamin C
Dosing Frequency Can Also Make a Difference
For More Information about Intravenous Vitamin C
Final Thoughts