In the poor countries a woman is simply a child-producing machine. Twelve children is normal; fifteen, eighteen, even two dozen children are not unheard of. Her whole life the woman goes on producing children. No education, no music, no art, no dance -- there is no time -- just bringing up children takes her whole life. It destroys her beauty, makes her body ugly. NEXTLINE In a richer country the woman is not going to allow it. She is now educated; she is now demanding liberation. And why should she destroy her body by producing children, when children can be produced in test tubes? Why destroy a beautiful woman, her proportionate body, her beautiful breasts? In no cultured country will a woman be ready to feed the child with her own breasts.

10 NEXTLINE YOU ARE FOR TOTAL BIRTH CONTROL AND FOR FREE EUTHANASIA FOR THOSE OVER SEVENTY-FIVE YEARS OF AGE. I FEEL THAT ALL THIS IS VERY SIMILAR TO THE NAZI IDEOLOGY. PLEASE COMMENT. NEXTLINE NEXTLINE I don't know anything about Nazi ideology, but if it is similar, it makes no difference. What I am saying is my understanding. If it is similar to some other ideology, it is a coincidence. NEXTLINE I want humanity to be more scientific as far as breeding is concerned. We have been producing too many idiots, retarded people, crippled people, blind people, sick people. And those people are going to suffer for their whole lives. This is not compassion. NEXTLINE There is no need, because each time a man makes love to a woman he releases one million sperm. Only one sperm, once in a while -- not every day -- will be able to get to the woman's egg. The remaining one million will die within two hours. Once one sperm has reached the egg, the egg closes, and the remaining ones have nothing to do but die. For two hours they can make their efforts, and within two hours there will be a line of one million soldiers dead. NEXTLINE One does not know, in those one million soldiers, how many Albert Einsteins have died, how many Zorbas have died, how many Socrateses have died. One million is a big number. NEXTLINE A single man, in his whole life, releases billions of living sperm. He alone can fill the whole earth with people. The whole credit goes to the woman... because she can only produce one child in one year. But this child is just accidental. And my feeling is, that amongst one million people who are rushing towards the woman's egg, there is every possibility that a Muhammad Ali may reach first, rather than Albert Einstein! NEXTLINE But we don't need Muhammad Alis. Boxing is such an ugly affair that it should be banned by law. The University of California has been researching for the last year: after each boxing match in California, for the following ten days the crime rates go thirteen percent higher -- murders, suicides, rapes. And still boxing continues. NEXTLINE There is every possibility that the humble people -- and all great people are humble -- will stand aside and let the other go first. And the primitive and the ugly, the political, will not bother at all; they will push their way through and reach the egg first. Why leave it to accident when it is now in our hands to decide who should reach the egg? NEXTLINE The man can simply donate his sperm to the medical lab. They can find the best out of the one million, and just inject the woman. Such a simple affair, and we can raise humanity to really superhuman beings. NEXTLINE Yes, it may sound something like the Nazi idea, but it is not Nazi. It is simple arithmetic, simple science, simply humanistic. We can cancel those people who will be sick, who will be blind, who will be retarded -- and we can choose the best. NEXTLINE For thousands of years man has not evolved. We don't know whether Charles Darwin is right or not. If he is right then it seems millions of years ago a few monkeys really took a quantum leap, became human beings, and since then we have not done anything comparable to that. We are far behind those monkeys who took the quantum leap and became human beings. It is time to take a quantum leap and through Science is the only way to do it. Your old methods are bullock-cart methods; they won't help. NEXTLINE So even if any of my ideas coincides with any other ideology, it does not matter. What matters is whether it is logical, rational, scientific, or not. Just by calling names you cannot criticize me. So remember, when you write your article, don't just start saying that I am a fascist or a Nazi ideologist. That will not be fair to me. Whatever I am saying, I am giving you my argument. NEXTLINE You can argue against my argument. If you have something better you can put it in, but don't try these methods which belong only to third-rate intellects. Call anything Nazi, and people just start thinking it is wrong. You have to prove why I am wrong. You are free to prove me wrong. I would love to listen to the argument that I am wrong, but I have always come across people who simply go on calling names. That is not intelligent. That is not human

The population increase is facing the world, and the pope and his other puppets are teaching against birth control. They are creating more and more poverty, more and more orphans. It is a strange game. NEXTLINE On the one hand they are creating more poverty, more orphans, more sickness, more death, and on the other hand they are opening hospitals for the sick people and orphanages for the orphans. And behind the scene the reality is that they are converting the poor people to Catholicism, just because they can provide bread and butter for them. NEXTLINE This is insulting the very dignity of human beings. You are purchasing their souls just by giving them bread and clothes, and you are the cause of their poverty. And you go on insisting that to use birth control methods is against God. Where is it written in your HOLY BIBLE that to use birth control methods is against God? And where is it written that to use airplanes is not against God? NEXTLINE You are using every technology that Science has given to you. But just about humanity, you don't want them not to be poor -- you don't want that there should be no orphans, because without orphans, what will Mother Teresa do? Who is going to give her the Nobel prize? For the Nobel prize orphans are needed. For the orphans the pill has to be condemned, birth control has to be condemned. NEXTLINE Now in India Christianity has become the third greatest religion. And who are the people who have become Christians? -- not a single brahmin, not a single cultured, educated or rich person. The beggars, the dying, the starving, the poor people who have no future -- these are becoming Christians. Do you think they are choosing your religion because of some religious quest, or for some material gain? NEXTLINE And why are you interested? Just to increase your numbers, because numbers have power -- it is a whole politics of numbers -- you are teaching people ugly things. NEXTLINE I was talking to a bishop, and I asked him, "How do you know that God is against birth control? He never revealed it to Jesus Christ. He never revealed it to any other prophet; he never revealed it to any other saint. How have you come to the conclusion...? In fact, seeing that God has only one son, it is enough proof that he follows birth control; otherwise, in eternity he would have created so many orphans that you would have run out of Nobel prizes!" NEXTLINE Perhaps that is the reason why he does not allow woman in the trinity. She must be kept somewhere in the house, hiding. But she is not allowed in the open, in public, because women are strange creatures. If you have a son, they nag you, "We need a daughter also." If you have a daughter, they nag you, "We have absolutely to have a son." If you have a son and daughter, then too the woman says, "Who knows, one of them may die. To be on the safe side, let us have at least three." NEXTLINE But God has only one begotten son. And you are teaching in poor countries like India that birth control methods are a sin. NEXTLINE Thirty years ago, when I started talking to people, I started telling them about birth control and its methods. I was stoned. Three times attempts on my life have been made because I am "destroying people's morality"; I am teaching things "against their religion." NEXTLINE When I started, India's population was four hundred million. Now India's population is nine hundred million. Five hundred million people have been added in thirty years. The country was poor even then. And the mathematicians and the economists were thinking five years ago, that by the end of the century India would have a population of one billion. But now they have to change it, the population is growing faster than they can calculate. NEXTLINE Now they have come up with a new estimate: by the end of the century India will have not only one billion people, but one billion and eight hundred million people -- almost two billion people. NEXTLINE There is no possibility for this country to survive. Who will be responsible? -- God? Jesus Christ... the pope... Mother Teresa...? Who will be responsible? These are the people who are corrupting the minds of people.