|
Corporate Cancer Causes - list not shown to us
Cancer is avoidable with information. They have it, they won't give it to us.
Date: 3/4/2006 2:34:20 PM ( 18 y ) ... viewed 2977 times
Have you heard? Canadians born today have a ONE-IN-TWO chance of getting cancer during their lives {is that about 100 times greater than just 50 years ago?]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREVENTION:
Imagine if corporations produced products that had carcinogenic compounds in them, and that the regulators [from the government WE elected] KNOW what products those are.
Then imagine that they have linked those products with those carcinogenic compounds to specific cancers, even produced a LIST of products and the cancers they produce.
But they refuse to give that list to us.
Nothing more needs to be said for people to realise that corporations are getting away with murder, that there really is a conspiracy between corporations and government regulators.
We need that list of carcinogenic compounds, so we can avoid cancer. It would be the cheapest form of cancer prevention ever.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That, above, is how cancers start.
Then we treat the victims, and that is another part to the great conspiracy...
TREATMENT:
The medical industry is bound to the corporate principles that govern them. Those rules say they MUST increase profits, not that they MUST cure cancer. Or any disease. In fact, they don't cure anything - they don't even try - they only purport to manage the symptoms with their pills.
Managing symptoms makes the patient shut up, mostly. As long as it doesn't hurt, great, carry on. Thats not good enough for people with a bit of pride tho, we need to actually be well to feel good. We need to be cancer-free, not surviving cancer for five years {which is what they use to say victims are "surviving cancer"].
Managing symptoms rakes in the money much more than a CURE for cancer. People I meet still say "if there was a cure for cancer, the company who finds it would be billionaires the next day, so sure they would use a cure for cancer if they had one." NOPE!! I don't think so. Repeat business, ongoing business, is much better than any one-shot business. Thats why there is no cure for cancer. The major pharmas are not even looking for one, I gaurantee it.
We spend way to much on TREATMENT for cancer, it should be 1/10th of what we spend on PREVENTION. Canada spends $14Billion/yr. on TREATMENTS, and about 1% that on prevention.
This much treatment spending might just be incentive to produce cancers....
-------
CBC's Wendy Mesley got breast cancer, and is now back to work with a show called "Chasing the Cancer Answer" - on CBC TV this Sunday eve [March 5 2006].
She is angry at the way it happened, and that her kids are at a one in two risk of cancer bothers her. Why doesn't it bother YOU??
Watch this show if you can.... She will talk about that list of known cancer-causing products that we cannot look at.
Add This Entry To Your CureZone Favorites! Print this page
Email this page
 Alert Webmaster
Status: RN Recommended for CureZone Newsletter
Attributes associated with this message:
RN Recommended for CureZone Newsletter
|
