What level of Mercury is "safe"?

The STUDIES keep piling up, but who funds the studies and who stands to gain if the studies report no link between vaccines and autism? Better, who stands to lose billions if they do report a link and who has the millions to fund the studies?

One of the studies was the corrupted one where vaccine making giant Johnson and Johnson was the hidden source of funds. "Pile" is the right term for studies like that one alright! And not the first study to be slanted in favor of Johnson and Johnson (do a google search for "Johnson and Johnson slanted studies")

No doubt, there are flawed and slanted studies on both sides with the smell of so much money in the air - but one side undeniably has much more to spend and much more to lose and a track record of faulty and slanted studies that dates back generations.

Personally, I think that NO AMOUNT of a toxic substance is safe. For example, if you swallow even a tiny bit of insecticide it is not a good thing. Same for any poison or toxic substance you swallow, are injected with or otherwise ingest or absorb. Of which mercury is a very dangerous one.

DQ Tweet