are not necessarily ""blubbering Idiot" type psychos

36,

In your other post, you said "are not necessarily ""blubbering Idiot" type psychos". I know you understand that I was not saying that Cho was NECESSARILY a "blubbering idiot" type, yet you seem to want to ARGUE, why is that? Is there a good reason that arguing is your goal? Do you not have a good reason for considering the possibility of a Conspiracy and rather make me feel defensive so as to deflect from the issue?

Do you think that even the media is going to be given truthful information? The US gov't. has no overriding motivation to ensure that the American people have TRUTH about anything.

It wouldn't be uncharacteristic of the gov't. to help/feed the press a "psy op" editorial with politically correct racial overtones to "CALM" the American public so we are distracted from "inquiry" and "satisfy" our curiosity (pacify us).

(or do you also believe the F.D.A. also has our best interests at heart?).

What reason could you have for objecting to the possibility that there could have been a conspiracy?

Anybody can make up a complaint about anything, but what good, solid reason could you have for an OBJECTION? Some people always complain because they just don't like the idea of somebody else besides themselves possibly being right about anything. I've always heard people mock, belittle, and ridicule Conspiracy theories, but they never give one good reason why they object. The US gov't. wants to keep it's war machine running smoothly and efficiently,...NOW and IN THE FUTURE.