From: DJ6467 4/26/2001 4:38 am
To: Cathy (AB_ALTMED) (13 of 53)
1791.13 in reply to 1791.1
If we are to accept from your article that this is a con and that the matter excreted is NOT Gallstones how then is it explained that a person who has an ultrasound scan that confirms the presence of gallstones, after the treatment has a second ultrasound that confirms the ABSENCE of gallstones?
>
> I just have to respond - I am a pathologist and I see gallbladders and Gallstones daily. I agree with your sources who told you those balls were not gallstones. They are most definitely NOT. It's actually pretty sad that people who don't know what Gallstones look like are all impressed by this and think they have passed stones.
> Ann Elizabeth (praticing pathologist)
>