John's Point of View of Rife Conference

Dear Mrs. Lightning,

I was going to post it at the Cure zone but the user name was slow in being received by the server, so you get it in your in-box instead. My view is multi faceted.

Speaking from a general vantage, having read your post as well as snippets from several other posts (including the arrogant ones), I remain overwhelmed at the paradoxes that invisibly manage people's behavior. What I mean by that is all the rhetoric about progress and what is better and how Modern is better than traditional viewpoints and how Quantum physics has supplanted Newtonian physics et al. always comes back to personal opinion rather than a genuine scientific assessment.

Most people's inability, I humbly discern, cannot recognize that they are unable to offer advice that is not in accord with their personal preferences suggesting that they are not seeking to be clear or truthful but rather are seeking, by various manipulative means, to become externally verified.

Medical solutions therefore are the artistic expression for some people who, if they are not careful, will lose sight of why the technology exists in the first place. Having made these points, I find most people to be remarkably unobjective. Their words seek to satisfy emotional rather than clinical issues which seems schizophrenic to me actually, or the work of a ventriloquist.

We have many simultaneous bodies as EM technology has shown, so why are the spiritual sciences ignoring this fact, and sustaining 250 year old paradigms that segregate and isolate and perpetuate personal property and the hero worship that goes with it?

This is not the point. Healing is the point and emotional indignity is the offending behavior. At some point, technology must be removed except for that which can enhance harmony during those times when imbalances are unavoidable. Shall we define those times before they occur? Absolutely not!

A harmonious body is nearly indestructible as far as bacteria are concerned. The bugs walk through large doors opened by our choices. Just like a blind man that uses his ears to see, and the Indian who hears the Earth's heartbeat, we must keep our dependencies in check prior to assessing which technology will sustain our vital disenfranchisement the longest. Our solutions otherwise express our doubts. That's my paradigm.

It seems to me that most of the responses to your post were reactions to specific issues, wherein they disagreed or felt ignored, and that this invisible component is ironically more significant than the medical issues that are allegedly at the heart of the matter. I find this behavioral tendency very very significant. What is the difference if we are using Rife technology in the 21st century versus 17th century blood letting techniques if we remain uncertain about the 'we', the 'me' or most importantly the 'I' whose mindset promotes and engenders the diseases in the first place? There is a quote by the late Dr. Lewis Thomas that I find relevant here. I may use this in my book as well.

“Only two centuries ago we could explain everything about everything, out of pure reason, and now, most of that elaborate and harmonious structure has come apart before our eyes. We are dumb. This is, in a certain sense, a health problem after all. For as long as we are bewildered by the mystery of ourselves, and confused by the strangeness of our uncomfortable connection to all the rest of life, and dumbfounded by the inscrutability of our own minds, we cannot be said to be healthy animals in today's world.”


That paragraph to me says so much and requires ultimately that we realize the role that our own minds play to regulate harmonious, or not harmonious, health.....period. Robert Pirsig once wrote, "If you want to paint a perfect picture, make yourself perfect and simply paint." I love that and most people think it's fantasy and idealistic! Some people have accused me of being idealistic which I find humorous and I offer another quote to suggest that their judgment was judgmental and not constructive because IMHO their dependence on emotion is their primary measure of reality and health as well which without reason again, requires external verification. My behavior contradicts their need as well does not verify so I am the bad guy often when what I am saying may be useful. I seek to know myself first and reacting gets terrifically in the way.

The recent movie called 'What the Bleep" (Go see it) includes a quote that states, "If we cannot control our emotions, we are addicted to them." Addictions are the source of disease because we hold the energy in one place and deny the transient flow that every medical modality has always sought to restore by various, mostly violent methods. I say hmmmmm, why violence?

Maybe it's fear and loathing that allows these emotions to remain indeed, out of control. In the words of my friend and singular mentor on this planet Conroy Cooper, "Truth is first felt" to which I add, what we do with how we feel determines our reality. In life you get what you expect and what you settle for! G, I suggest that you do not settle for the device you named being the Rifian basis of well being. It rather points to a knowledge which combines with vital wisdom guiding you to optimal health. These devices cannot alone cure and the pursuit of that desire is an error!

The other aspect of your post is the language that you use. It's the same as your post to me as well the way you speak which is very endearing and genuine and honest. Your Curezone critics seem put off by the lack of scientific rigor in one sense, and in the opposite sense, your personal choices offend as if their is some resolved state of affairs to which they have exclusive access. More schizophrenia!

They desire in one sense a pure answer so they can be most clear about their assault on your position, but then they want that answer to match their own preferences which I find pathological! Your preferences for recognition of Dr. Clark is a personal desire. The individual whose jealousy confuses this with scientific rhetoric is flatly out of control and would do well to apologize to you and then to himself. Your post is your experience period.

What I gleaned personally from it is how much I did not pay attention to ALL that was there. Interestingly though, my ill-defined agenda was clearly answered. I have learned to direct an intention and then pull it out of the way in order to arrive just right. These different approaches are the difference as well between Rife technology and Cymatics. The Pap Imi device is worth a deeper look because it operates from a completely different paradigm and is not Rife technology at all.

Several comments that you made I find interesting because in each instance it is clear you were filtering the entire time you were there in order to meet an predetermined agenda. I am wondering if with the same data, you could arrive at a different conclusion simply by framing the questions differently? An aside, it is my view that our mindset and our physical conditions are inverse mirrors of each other, similar to the way the eyeball works.

Without elaboration, and using a marvelous article about ketchup as an example of discernment and refinement and further a metaphor for the searches we impose on ourselves for optimal living, is it more correct to resolve truth via trial and error and filtrations (eidetic reduction), or by relaxing our need for control and allowing the very philosophy if you will, of EM technology to govern our decisions by magnetic attraction as opposed to intellectual imposition? Maybe even both? Sorry long sentence!

The ketchup article [http://www.gladwell.com/2004/2004_09_06_a_ketchup.html] suggests why Heinz ketchup remains the flavor of choice after many many years. It has the staying power that all of the medical modalities desire. It's the clear winner for having achieved one difficult goal, but also how simply this goal is expressed by including all of the archetypal flavors that humans are capable of differentiating that are carefully balanced into the ingredients of the red stuff. Sweet, sour, pungent, bitter and......one another that I cannot recall. What if medicine were the same, or our intentions were also broad rather than focused when we endeavor to resolve an answer?

Courtrooms require precedents, but EM technology does the searching for us! Is it that we are unwilling to give up control to our devices or that we recognize somewhere deep inside, that these devices do not in fact invoke cures? I say this on purpose G. to stick your ribs with an idea that forms my way of thinking, that is, for lack of a better way of describing it, 'unthinking' and allowing within a solid knowledge base, answers to fall into place. We gather data via patterns, we organize it, we synthesize it, we formalize it, test it to repetition and formalize the expected results and then hold on for dear life hoping that our presumptions are correct.

What I am after is the intelligence that binds us. The very spirit that gives form and advises knowledge including the sits that leads to EM solutions in the first place. Where are we in this process? Is it about the body or the technology or are these somehow perversely equivalent? Marshall McCLuhan wrote volumes about media and technology and has been suitably ignored, just as Rife was conspires against and Tesla's discoveries were usurped. They expressed from that soulful place that is an EM fortress and each made the fatal error of giving it to the world and making it available to the small minded people who maintain that we are what we drive, and eat, and wear and all the ignorant rest. I am inspired by a device that quietly informs, a human technology that pervades and locates those that are receptive because it is simply the raising of the energy that will yield healthy results. A cell of high energy cannot become ill!

This raises the question of what is natural and how our dependence on unnatural solutions alienates the soul of our intentions to feel well and live well. Part of the reason why I feel this is important to understand is that our knowledge continues to split and multiply and we cannot know more and more particularly when the information is the same bias in high tech clothing. None of these acknowledge a human context and without context there is no humanity because subjectivity is subsumed by objective dependence (left brain reality) so wherein this bizarro paradigm, is there true healing? There is only the idea of healing so how strange it will be for skeptical patients to sit in a room and feel little pulses and receive a check in the mail? I suppose no different than taking a pill and receiving a check in the mail. That is my issue with Rife tech despite my respect for it's remarkable diagnostic capabilities. The paradigm is ignoring the holistic nature of which the data is gathered.

Said another way, healing is harmony but instead of using scalpels we now use 'zappers' which are playful reinterpretations of guns or more specifically, Rife Rayguns? Guns, guns and more guns. Are we as well still emotionally out of control regarding out intentions to cure? Is it possible that the emotional dilemmas are the reason we need cured? It remains my view that the notions deposited, or rather the conditions which lead to inquiry, are formidably built right into our solutions. I pare aware not to resolve purity of reason, but rather to underscore the spirit of intention through which the remaining details emerge crystal clear without any effort.

I left the conference unsure of what I learned. What I needed jumped right into my suitcase and the people whose voice harmonizes with my own have mostly all already been in touch including the surprises. I could not have designed that but I certainly can provide the potential for it to occur. Maybe we are merely being sentimental about general practitioners?

Back to basics, strangers mostly arrive at a conference with different agendas. Each want to leave feeling enhanced and justified that it was several hundred dollars well spent. Others likely want to market their devices and still others like to talk and were invited to discuss their ideas as conference speakers. Imagine instead the normal trepidation of unfamiliar places was forgotten for one solemn weekend in Seattle; that this Rife group uniquely introduced the idea that we are only going to say what is needed and only going to take what is compatible.

Life for those few days would change as we know it and the conclusion would have been dramatically different. We would discover not the best and worst for this is self evident simply by the results and the magnetic attractions for those whose intellect is not too much in the way, but rather more generally, potentialities and as one of the contributors who responded to your post suggested, that there are benefits from an array of diagnostics and treatments which is nearly always the case.....

I do not support that there is a best device though I will concede that maybe one of the devices may offer more thorough solutions comparable to Walmart, where you can buy tires and bread in the same store, if you understand the analogy. Holistic thinking comes in any forms! Without exception the best devices will be handled by the best humans, and who are they, well who knows because each person has a context through which there is one best answer for each individual scenario.

Yes, general compatibilities exist indubitably, but no book was ever written from a single source. That statement has many implications! It's no different than finding a partner in life really! Women, better than men know that no single man ever adds up right! ;-) As we learn that cells are transceivers and virtually void of matter and this is our constituency, I remain painfully uncertain how this does not affect the momentum of goals and decisions made in many categories. I have much to say about the ideas which underscore our choices and am quite concerned about the effects that technology running rampant will do to an unwise populace.

I see Rife technology as an EM equivalent to the pharmaceuticals and that they are targeting direct correspondences that can be owned and capitalized which destroys the intention of the devices. This same condition occurred with the mapping of the genome. In the future, individuals will reap dividends from genetic shopping lists so that blue eyes will have a market value. I hope the next Ice Age arrives before bio service stations or every bad sci fi flick might just prove to be true. I am not cynical really, but looking hard at the facts and paying very very close attention to behavior and awareness and I am finding that technology is slowly putting people to sleep, just as McCluhan said it would.

I wonder if angels need Cell Phone s?

All the best,

John

Tweet