Not impressed with some of the statements

Well personally I find it amazing how you can not give any credit to the FSCAN 2 machine. It was stated that the energy in the hall/room was tremendous from all these Rife and alike machines. I find it strange how this could not be taken into consideration when getting different frequencies? Dr.Lloyd uses Fscan, Sutherland uses Fscan and many more. Why would people like this use a Fscan 2 if they are so unreliable? Granted their frequency generators are not as good as a f160 etc but from a DIRP function these doctors use them alot. I'm surprised at VTOOL not bringing this Fscan issue up considering hes used one alot and its helped him. Maybe its because he knows differently and cant be bothered to argue.

Also if you wish to utilise a 32Khz which personally I thought it was 30Khz zapper then do so. I myself would not even bother with these units because I know even a 15Hz zapper is not the be all and end all. There is nothing as good as a plasma tube (EMEM2/3) apart from RF except the worrying aspects of RF. Again Mike Vanderpool was correct in saying we cannot rely on one device such as a zapper. Even Hulda Clark admitted somewhere about her frequency zappers being to high if im correct. Even if that statement is wrong, we know its right in electronics and and the body.

I mean your statement about THE MOLECULAR ENHANCER oh this thing made me feel funny standing near it. What kind of talk is this for people who want to know about the Molecular Enhancer? I'd rather have a M.W.O (M.E) than most of the machines you've mentioned and at that show. Yet you chose to ignore and in my opinion come out with a statement which could put people off.

All I say folks is carry on with what your doing using zappers and regardless what people make out, we need higher powered electro healing afterwards for the serious person. You should then look into a M.W.O, Fscan 2 for DIRP and a good RIFE/BARE unit fully programmable to knock off anything left.

I wonder what these people who have used the FSCANs to find what their problem is they are enduring think of this! I mean they have found their EXACT problem then destroyed it with the FSCAN frequencies in a RIFE/BARE machine. Some have even used a Fscan to do the whole work. Strange this, if its so unreliable hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

If you want a Rife machine get a good EMEM2 or 3 tube setup with a good PDA (or PC) linked to a F100-160 fg. Again try and get some method of knowing what your targetting like a Fscan DIRP etc. Regardles what zapper fans say YOU STILL NEED a device like this for left overs. Zappers aren't as great as were told and I have proof of this recently this is why I am into Plasma. I still strongly suggest a quality M.W.O, either from Dan Dial with the Molecular Enhancer or a Zephyr Tech Lakhovsky coil MWO unit. The only problem with the coil units is they need calibrating etc and its not an easy task to do correctly.

VTOOL i am disappointed in you about this Fscan issue as I thought you stood up for what you thought. How can you fight the medical establishment and NWO if nothing is said. I aint frightened to argue my point with people even if they are more of an authority than myself. I would argue or ask a difference with Sutherland if I had one. Although I doubt Sutherland would make me feel this way. Come on your a Fscan user and please we'd like YOUR thoughts not Mike Vanderpools again unless credit is given, I dont like be duped.
©†ƒ……•™¼‡_Original_Message_¾€š½ž¢«»¬ï°©

Well personally I find it amazing how you can not give any credit to the FSCAN 2 machine. It was stated that the energy in the hall/room was tremendous from all these Rife and alike machines. I find it strange how this could not be taken into consideration when getting different frequencies? Dr.Lloyd uses Fscan, Sutherland uses Fscan and many more. Why would people like this use a Fscan 2 if they are so unreliable? Granted their frequency generators are not as good as a f160 etc but from a DIRP function these doctors use them alot. I'm surprised at VTOOL not bringing this Fscan issue up considering hes used on alot and its helped him. Maybe its because he knows differently and cant be bothered to argue.

Also if you wish to utilise a 32Khz which personally I thought it was 30Khz zapper then do so. I myself would not even bother with these units because I know even a 15Hz zapper is not the be all and end all. There is nothing as good as a plasma tube (EMEM2/3) apart from RF except the worrying aspects of RF. Again Mike Vanderpool was correct in saying we cannot rely on one device such as a zapper. Even Hulda Clark admitted somewhere about her frequency zappers being to high if im correct. Even if that statement is wrong, we know its right in electronics and and the body.

I mean you statement about THE MOLECULAR ENHANCER oh this thing made me feel funny standing near it. What kind of talk is this for people who want to know about the Molecular Enhancer? I'd rather have a M.W.O (M.E) than most of the machines you've mentioned and at that show. Yet you chose to ignore and in my opinion come out with a statement which could put people off.

All I say folks is carry on with what your doing using zappers and regardless what people make out we need higher powered electro healing afterwards for the serious person. You should then look into a M.W.O, Fscan 2 for DIRP and a good RIFE/BARE unit fully programmable to knock off anything left.

I wonder what these people who have used the FSCANs to find what there problem is they are enduring think of this! I mean they have found their EXACT problem then destroyed it with the FSCAN frequencies in a RIFE/BARE machine. Some have even used a Fscan to do the whole work. Strange this, if its so unreliable hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

If you want a Rife machine get a good EMEM2 or 3 tube setup with a good PDA (or PC) linked to a F100-160 fg. Again try and get some method of knowing what your targetting like a Fscan DIRP etc. Regardles what zapper fans say YOU STILL NEED a device like this for left overs. Zappers aren't as great as were told and I have proof of this recently this is why I am into Plasma. I still strongly suggest a quality M.W.O either from Dan Dial with the Molecular Enhancer or a Zephyr Tech Lakhovsky coil MWO unit. The only problem with the coil units is they need calibrating etc and its not an easy task to do correctly.

VTOOL i am disappointed in you about this Fscan issue as I thought you stood up for what you thought. How can you fight the medical establishment and NWO if nothing is said. I aint frightened to argue my point with people even if they are more of an authority than myself. I would argue or ask a difference with Sutherland if I had one. Although I doubt Sutherland would make me feel this way. Come on your a Fscan user. Tweet