Re: my question for you...

you said "But yes, if this thing is not won at this point, it won't be because of a few car bombs in Bagdad. It will be largely because of the political firestorm on the left."

I'm not suggesting that a few car bombs could lose the war but if we continue until administration decides to withdraw, and the government crumbles or falls into civil war, how can that be blamed on the political climate created by the dems? It doesn't have to be lost to car bombs targeted at American troops but can be lost by the bad planning and implementation that has followed the war. If the administration is allowed to continue exactly as it wishes to, according to its plans and the newly created government turns out to be like Iran or crumbles into civil war, how can that be the fault of the libs/dems? The administration has carried out its plans without caring about the opinions of those who dissent, so how, if those plans fail, can they blame those who were against those plans? That just seems insane. How, in your mind, can the dems not be at fault for any future failure in Iraq? or is any failure immediately their fault?
Tweet