Re: Classic Disinfo Specialist...surg.in Lancet

I refuted your arguments for your interpretation of the woman's flush and surgery result and then dismissed your conclusions. You did not reply with any valid counter argument point by point.

From reading your replies to the others here, I expect you would give the same answers if you did reply, after my argument, as you did before my argument. This shows you did not take my answer into consideration. Your typical habit with others also. When you could have shed light on why microscopy was so superior by explaining the reasons and presenting the facts, you declined.

I did not use any Conspiracy theory in my making my argument. However many Conspiracy theories there are, I didn't need to use any such theory to show you your conclusions were unfounded. Or to use one of your terms, unproven. Tweet