Spot Disinfo 101
resurrectionist says:
"well well Bluestone
I wonder who here has the medical degree and postgraduate qualification in general medicine? who therefore knows what they are talking about me?
I think you'll find its me!
Do you know about the classification of evidence in EBM? Do you know much about expansion of trinucleotide repeats and the phenomenon of anticipation? No I doubt it somehow."
Are you trying to be condesending to evoke an emotional response. Classic
disinfo!
I invite others reading your posts to check them against the link in order to identify the techniques you are desperatly trying to utilize. I took instant notice of the following tactic at the disinfo link in regards to your last post.
8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough 'jargon' and 'minutia' to illustrate you are 'one who knows', and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.
As far as your corporate
Science club....
You and your waning diciples can take *your* time up, if you like, with quantifying skidmarks, instead of looking at what actually causes accidents, while quality of life gets worse and worse amidst corporate
Science and deception. Meanwhile others are turning away in droves (patients and practitioners)from the fragmented, and thus incomplete view taken within the mainstream medical paradigm and focusing on the holistic interrelationship of health and wellness. Yes it is true the body can heal itself...amazing...but true.
Of course letting this idea resurface threatens the largest industry in the world responsible for the most pain and suffering of all time. So in come the disruptors and infiltrators to do what they do. Control information. Divide and conquor!
The tone of your message is one of egotism which is a revealing view into the character type that supports this failing model of false healing and hope.
You spend many hours a day here which strongly suggests you are highly motivated. Could it be to create doubt in the exploration of alternatives to the corporate medical cult that is desperatly trying to hang onto their diminishing foothold?
That's alot of time to spend at a site you don't believe...time you could be getting paid utilizing your superior knowledge. Unless of course, *this* is your job.
You portray yourself as proud of your education (read indoctrination) and look down the nose of anyone who won't play in your court using your tools of evaluation (industry pseudo science, etc). I call this mediocre mind syndrome. A syndrome that people with similar arrogant, self serving mindests fall prey to. It reminds me of many "scientists" and politicians, from many eras, that display the same self serving arrogance and miss the bigger, ever evolving and expanding picture. In fact if it wasn't for people who think outside the box (against criticism form their mundane peers), mainstream would fall off the edge of the earth of their thinking. Of course greed has a way of turning off some people's sensibilities so that whoring comes easier.
But then I suspect agent provacateurs know this and are just doing their job to disrupt the flow and muddy the image. Personally I am glad you are here because I think it is very valuable for people to observe your tactics so they can see how low pharma will stoop to keep their disease business alive.
Having a "medical" person say
"I wonder who here has the medical degree and postgraduate qualification in general medicine? who therefore knows what they are talking about me? I think you'll find its me!" demonstrates very nicely the arrogance and flawed logic that you portray. It is akin to a rooster guarding the henhouse, only you are guarding the disease paradigm flown by the pharmaceutical corporate goliath that has no interest in cures but an ongoing interest in maximum profitability.
It wasn't long ago that medical mainstream used "science" (for hire) to rationalize the use of tobacco in a similar chastizing manner. Your ilk has blood letting in their closet as well. I am sure they were smuggly defending their dogma based on "science' in their day too.
Here is how the tobacco industry uses research (science) to deceive...not unlike the group of drug dealers you find yourself in bed with.
http://tc.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/12/suppl_3/iii7