Re: Study examines researchers’ practices (Medical Ethics & Health Politics) 6/23/2005 422888

Re: Study examines researchers’ practices

Views: 4,446
Published: 20 y

This is a reply to # 422,886

Re: Study examines researchers’ practices

Advertisement
Tapeworms, Round worms, Flukes?
Hulda Clark Cleanses

"As a result of this focus there has been a lot of poor quality research produced purely to boost someone's CV"

couldn't agree more, the lancet piece being a perfect example. although i guess technically that piece was really some damage control to the lancet's reputation as a result of the earlier published letter. no surprise here.

john g

All of my messges on this board All of my messges anywhere

Add To Favorites!

Like Dislike

Alert Moderators

DISCLAIMER

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!

Expand the next 20 of 36 messages

Study examines researchers’ practices RN zule 20 y 5,560
- http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v435/n7043/fu... zule 20 y 5,073
  - Thank you for posting that. I have long been a ... resurrectionist 20 y 4,557
    - ”As a result of this focus there has been a lot of... johng 20 y 4,446
      This is the position of the above message within the thread.
      - Learn how to properly critique a paper johng resurrectionist 20 y 4,830
        
        Re:Learn how to properly critique--get scientifica... DangerousProduce 20 y 4,883
        
        Classic Disinfo Specialist... Blue Stone 20 y 5,065
        
        Classic defense mechanisms against dissonance resurrectionist 20 y 5,063
        
        Re: you are both "padding your paper" DangerousProduce 20 y 4,836
        
        Dangerous Goods the ultimate arbiter - not! resurrectionist 20 y 4,620
        
        its the old reliable ”i’m a doctor and therefore i... johng 20 y 4,597
        
        No, its a comment on who has the most experience o... resurrectionist 20 y 4,650
        
        Resquack obsesses on! Chaz 20 y 4,791
        
        Spot Disinfo 101 Blue Stone 20 y 4,717
        
        Spot rubbish resurrectionist 20 y 4,660
        
        quackwatch... what a chuckle... johng 20 y 4,534
        
        Re:Classic Disinfo Specialist....an irrelevant sta... DangerousProduce 20 y 4,611
        
        Re:Classic Disinfo Specialist....Desperate Produce... Chaz 20 y 4,630
        
        Re: Classic Disinfo Specialist.....tripped over it... DangerousProduce 20 y 4,560
        
        Take up the Guantlet Blue Stone 20 y 4,573
        
        Expand the next 16 of 36 messages
        
        Re: Take up the Guantlet-do you mean "gauntlet"? resurrectionist 20 y 4,681
        
        Correction BLue Stone 20 y 4,702
        
        Re: More Correction.... DangerousProduce 20 y 4,560
        
        Re: Classic Disinfo Specialist... resurrectionist 20 y 4,493
        
        Really I should do more of this lazy ”cut & paste”... resurrectionist 20 y 4,493
        
        Re: Classic Disinfo Specialist...surg.in Lancet DangerousProduce 20 y 4,656
        
        Not much room for misinterpretation in Lancet arti... resurrectionist 20 y 4,898
        
        I remember now resurrectionist 20 y 4,640
        
        You are trying to be scientific by using words lik... DangerousProduce 20 y 4,739
        
        You still don't get it resurrectionist 20 y 4,626
        
        Tactics continue...*yawn* Blue Stone 20 y 4,673
        
        I don't do tactics resurrectionist 20 y 4,598
        
        Tactics of altmedders resurrectionist 20 y 4,779
        
        Vague diagnostic tool resurrectionist 20 y 4,677
        
        scientific literacy is rare here- and you haven't ... resurrectionist 20 y 4,554
        
        Yah everybody sees what a self indulgent egotist y... Chaz 20 y 4,697

Donate to CureZone

CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com

Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

0.484 sec, (1)

Re: Study examines researchers’ practices

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!

This is the position of the above message within the thread.