Did macro-evolution happen?

Since getting into this seriously I've mostly looked at the genetic possiblility of Darwin's theory...which has turned out to be impossible. As far as macro-evolution goes, my study in this area is lacking. What I can tell you though is we have the cambrian explosion, which is a term that describes how all but one of the animal phyla groups (broad categories) appeared in the fossil record in the same strata of earth. Since this original appearance (with no genetic or transitional ancestors before them) animals have changed/adapted over time to the point where today many animals appear totally different than what they did back then.

This adaptation is pretty clearly induced by an environment change. But the extent to which animals can change or adapt is still in question. For example are the lion and the tiger from a common ancestor -- or were they created seperately? Hard to say for sure, but they can interbreed and produce non-steril offspring, which tells me they may have had a common feline ancestor. But this is no biggie in my eyes...just details for the paleontologists to fight over.

The horror for me is, it's obvious that "science" has been lying and concealing information to the general public for the past century. I'm to the point to where I don't believe a single word they say -- about anything. This includes the age of the earth, dating techniqes, lineages, charts, graphs, DNA, bones -- NOTHING. The whole system is corrupt from the top down. This is because only those who subscribe to Darwanian thinking are considered to be real "scientists." Everyone else is scoffed at and called religious wackos -- even if they aren't one.

As far as man evolving from a monkey. Once again, common sense says this is highly impossible. The sun cannot evolve from the moon. You cannot tell me that man evolved feelings, beliefs, anger, guilt, happiness, humor, anger, shame, and love from an animal that has none of this. Also scientists have huge holes to fill in the fossil record to link man to beast. (remember man supposedly "evolved" 100,000 years ago -- some say much sooner...but have you ever noticed that the only bones scientists dig up are always from millions of years ago? What about more recent times? Where are those fossils showing a half-slumped-over, long-armed human/beast creature? The answer is they simply don't exist. Also it has been shown that man cannot breed with apes and produce an offspring by natural methods...(It has been tried)...which tells me that the fairy-tale of man coming from apes is nothing but fantasy based on scientists obsessions with beastiality.

If I've learned one thing in my search, it is that common sense is always your best measure of what happened. Not only that but the simple answer is almost always the correct one. S