Sure, but some of yesterday's got wiped off.....

maybe this will.
I would be very interested to hear your reasons for being convinced the Liver Flush "stones" are pre-formed.
My own view is that they cant be, because there isn't room for the volumes reported by some.
I did chemistry at university, but never followed it up as a career, since I found something that interested me far more, so I'm very rusty and have no inclination (nor time) to swot up, in order to attempt to make my theory more scientific.
A lot of medical people (who have either done a dgree course that included a speciality in some alternative, or who have open minds towards alternatives) have expressed great interest in the Liver Flush and would like to be able to research it.
They agree that the amounts of oil taken would be likely to produce a very large expulsion of bile from the gall bladder, with resulting cholesterol reducing effects.
There are two reasons for reluctance for some practical research. Those I have spoken to who are in General Practice, would not be able to tell any patient to do a flush, since the practice has never been formally tested and they would be violating the rules that govern their practising medicine.
Those who are researchers would be able to put the Liver-Flush to the test, on volunteers, as happens with new techniques. Their relunctance to do so is mainly down to two words - Hulda Clark .
That name is the one that is most widely known in connection with LF. It is seen as a very bad name, in medical circles over here, not because of the liver flush, but because of the Cure for Aids, Cancer and All Diseases Books.
That is one of the reasons that I view Clark as a major enemy of those who, like me, would like to see the continental style "marriages" of allopathic and alternatives strengthened and spread throughout the world.
©†ƒ……•™¼‡_Original_Message_¾€š½ž¢«»¬ï°©

maybe this will.
I would be very interested to hear your reasons for being convinced the Liver Flush "stones" are pre-formed.
My own view is that they cant be, because there isn't room for the volumes reported by some.
I did chemistry at university, but never followed it up as a career, since I found something that interested me far more, so I'm very rusty and have no inclination (nor time) to swot up, in order to attempt to make my theory more scientific.
A lot of medical people (who have either done a dgree course that included a speciality in some alternative, or who have open minds towards alternatives) have expressed great interest in the liver flush and would like to be able to research it.
They agree that the amounts of oil taken would be likely to produce a very large expulsion of bile from the gall bladder, with resulting cholesterol reducing effects.
There are two reasons for reluctance for some practical research. Those I have spoken to who are in General Practice, would not be able to tell any patient to do a flush, since the practice has never been formally tested and they would be violating the rules that govern their practising medicine.
Those who are researchers would be able to put the Liver-Flush to the test, on volunteers, as happens with new techniques. Their relunctance to do so is mainly down to two words - Hulda Clark .
That name is the one that is most widely known in connection with LF. It is seen as a very bad name, in medical circles over here, not because of the liver flush, but because of the Cure for Aids, Cancer and All Diseases Books.
That is one of the reasons that I view Clark as a major enemy of those who, like me, would like to see the continental style "marriages" of allopathic and alternatives spread throughout the world. Tweet