Re: confused :/

I have to wonder, first of all, about the legitimacy of the entire article because:

1. He/she deleted certain aspects of it, simply because he/she didn't believe in it.

2. The semantics and spelling errors. e.g. "It is widely used as a home remedy for both internal and external use for at least tow hundred years" plus many other errors.
To me, if someone were wanting to be believed and taken seriously, they would have a working knowledge of the English language and be a bit more tedious about the spelling (and ability to fix the transposition of letters in a word) and sentence structure in the article.

When I begin to see errors like that abounding in an article, I stop reading.

Just my humble opinion.

-Loni