Re: personal attacks

>- we really could care less about the reputation of machines. Zappers in my view are no different from toasters or basketballs. I don't feel any special need to treat them gently. I think technically it's allowed to be abusive toward zappers on curezone.

Yes, but you make it obvious that you do not care about misleading people on here who are seeking valid information.

These are SUPPORT groups and providing reasons and backing them up is far more helpful to those people than your attacks on defenseless inanimate objects.

-> nearly strong enough for people who are in deep doodoo with their health.

I disagree while at the same time agreeing in part.

I have never said that a zapper could entirely restore any person's health. First, it is not a health machine, it is a microbe killer. If your health is poor then you are probably in some way deleteriously affected by some form of microbe. The fastest way to avoid additional serious consequences from those microbes is to somehow destroy them. At least in water, multi-frequency zappers are much faster and more effective than Antibiotics .

What I am saying is that you are in the hospital, dying of MRSA or or Antibiotic resistant C. difficle, then you might want you doctor to try using a more serious product. I personally had a Staph Aureus infection in my sinuses that Antibiotics did not stop, yet within a couple of hours after applying LVPEF from a ParaZapper MX, it was almost completely gone. This does not mean that the zapper did it and it does not mean that it would work for anyone else, but that is my experience and I think that is a completely valid reason for a study to be done.

I will state right now that a zapper with wrist straps has a very poor chance of reaching microbes inside of the body and any zapper with two hand holds is not going to reach much better.

Additionally, while Dr. Clark's claim that any frequency will do is erroneous, the use of multiple frequencies will certainly work better. This was demonstrated in Dr. Thiel's study.

Dr. Clark never intended to have zappers used alone. She did say that they were a part of her protocol.

>- All we want to see is 10 or 20 posts of people who zapped and then took a picture of a giant worm covered in scat, is that too much to ask?

Ask the people who post. That is not my job and if you bothered to read the FDA letter, if I did that, I could land in jail.

I did not bother to take pictures of my stool when I passed worms because I though that it would be a normal thing from the proper use of a good zapper combined with the right combination of electrodes. I just did not think that it was necessary.

>- no one owes you anything as far as being obliged to protect the reputation of zappers

I absolutely agree, but you do owe the other people here fair and valid information. Anything else is deception, if only deception by omission.

>- promoting your products and all he did

He was pestering me about something that I did not post. I did not post anything about zappers killing worms. Not one time did I start a thread with any claim of zappers killing worms. I have mentioned my experience only in response to others.

>- he just wanted some meat.

I posted 10 cases ( there are about 30 that I know of ) which apparently included something that you posted but I did not recognize it as yours. This is part of what I am saying, if you thought it worked, you need to go back and correct the post and you should provide fair and reasonable explanation of what was used and what happened. That is not for me, it is for the readers who deserve the best information.

>- But currently there is no one on the board who is having success with zappers for serious infections.

Actually, I do not know of anyone who is currently using zappers for worms at all on these forums. They have been so badly bashed that no one is bothering.

BTW, if anyone is using zappers for worms, please step up and let us know.

>- lot of time painstakingly tying to debunk our observations that no one currently on curezone is having success

That is because with just 10 posts, that claim is debunked. You can not say no one has because there are actually about 30 cases.

>- some audacity in monetizing your time spent here answering questions

Just shows that it is not about the money. If it was about the money, I would not even be bothering with the posting.

Tweet