Find it interesting that Sarah NEVER addressed the Dr Stead parts of the posts, the fact that she was rude concerning him, dismissed his professional background and opinions out of hand with no firsthand knowledge or research (and from all I have read she is only a nutritionist and not a medical doctor), declined to accept his generous invitation to meet, ignored his offer to show medical study information and possibly if complete at that time clinical trial data results, has completely bashed in other information that she has posted studies done abroad - when most patients that do intensive research on clinical trials know most of the groundbreaking research is done outside the US and the UK where Dr Stead is apparently located is at the forefront on many diseases - and responded with what could have been written by either a clever marketing professional or some lawyers I have met in previous incarnations. The paypal defense meant little to me as the 'customer' was referring to the initial responses received when he contacted her company with a problem not addressing an eventual resolution by third parties. All in all she still comes across as probably a well packaged and marketed, and possibly a well intended (but not sure about this), purveyor of alternative treatments. Disclaimer - some alternative treatments may cause more damage by the treatment or be just placebos and others may have some benefits, although not always for the described condition - only the test of time will accurately assess which is the case. Hopefully no harm will be done by treatments she markets if used as she instructs. Personally - not a site I would order from or use as THE authority on any medical condition - but as an adjunct to other opinions - certainly - all opinions can be helpful if only as a springboard for additional hypotheses to be proved or disproved thereby narrowing focus and eventual cures - to know what is important you must first rule out what is not!