Re: I agree with what you explained but that was not what i meant.

>- it means that the current is not spread equally through all parts of the body but instead through one or several big paths and several small paths.

Yes, I do agree that with a two electrode system, the signal will basically be the strongest in a path that is close to being directly between the two electrodes. This goes with any placement. I showed this in my tests of field intensity across various points of the body with various placements of two electrodes.

This is the very reason that I introduced the augmentation footpads to improve the overall distribution of the signal. Perhaps a 5 point system would be better in protecting areas that you might be concerned over.

>- one on the forehead near the eyes and one on the back of the head at the bottom) there is a "white effect",

Yes, this is forcing more of the signal through the optic pathway, through the eyes, down the optic nerve, and through the occipital lobe. This is the very reason that I warn to avoid being near the eyes and the base of the skull.

Also, note that when the electrode is placed far enough away from the eyes and the other electrode is far enough from the base of the skull, the majority signal passes outside of the skull through the scalp because the distance is significantly shorter and therefore, the resistance is less through that path. It does not mean however, that none passes through the optical route, it may be just below your threshold of sensitivity.

>- Yes, i agree, but i don't feel any worms biting or moving in this area, that's why i have not mentionned it (bladder).

This is the very reason that I did mention it. Dr. Clark said that the zapper could not reach inside of the bladder. Yet, according to our past surveys, the customers who responded to having used augmentation footpads, 100 percent reported significant success in stopping bladder infections while those who did not use the pads reported almost no success. This is significant and bears witness to what I am saying. Everything depends on the actual method of application,

>- you can't compare toxoplasma which is a small and probably weak organism with parasites like roundworms,

I only present it as evidence that the brain area can be and essentially is reached by the pulses from the zapper. This basically negates any claim that the brain can not be reached by the zapper.

I do completely agree that Ascaris is probably the absolutely most difficult parasite to kill in the body. Yes, Ascaris will tend to migrate to any area that produces less of a threat to it.

That aside, I still submit that if you had started with a 4 point contact system, having 3 points positive, you would have had better luck killing your adversaries and significantly reduced chance of having them migrate, except torward the hand with the negative electrode. I guess that a rancher would call it herding.

I do believe that possibly a fifth small electrode at the neck area may have been beneficial in helping to herd the critters away from delicate areas.

I also believe that the zapper used may have a definite influence on the outcome. I think that many people start with cheaper zappers to save money or just because they are not sure it works and in the long run, they pay a price.

>- Maybe the effeciency of a zapper is not a matter of the amount of current one can take, but rather a matter of a specific waveform or a specific frequency

I agree, that it is a combination. You need sufficient voltage and current as well as the right frequency and waveform. If any of these criteria are not met, then complete success can not follow.

>- because all the zappers i have tried were not powerfull enough to kill big parasites.

What zappers have you tried? And have you tried them with paddles and augmentation footpads ( not the regular footpads that come from some zapper companies ).
Tweet