Kindly, what is the scientific evidence behind Rife?

I have some chronic disease, and i know this is the biofrequency forum. So i have massive knowledge of all kinds of medical treaments alternative and otherwise.

I have read alot about bioelectric therapies including blood electrification, zapping, rife frequncies, magnetic therapy, and light frequency therapies.

I have read alot of bad stuff about Hulda Clark on places like quackwatch.com and i figure if the stuff that she knew really worked, it would be alot more popular by now.

If you could diagnose people with a sycrometer, and treat them by electric stimulation at certain places, it would seem to make disease much easier to treat.

There are people who claim that the frequencies will break open the cell they claim, and others who say that the frequencies will make the cells stronger.

I know it maybe possible to kill bugs in a dish using frequencies (in vitro) but i find it hard to belive that there is a way to do this in vivo (inside a person) and also there is the question of what in the hell that would do to the rest of the cells in your body! There are like 5 trillion difernt chemicals and cells in our body and they all must have a mortal frequency and im sure there is some overlap. So there.

I know theres some second hand information about royal rife supposedly curing cancer with his machine, but is there any real proof of rife machines working? wouldnt it be much more popular if they did? i know for sure im real interested in it and i would for sure buy one if it worked, and didnt hurt my body.

it all just seems very unlikley thats all. i wish i could believe these claims and the claims of Hulda Clark right off the bat, but my scientific mind says not so fast. sorry for poking around so much. just wanted some opinoins is all.

thanks,
willtheory