We have nothing to sell. Besides, you sound like a person who will get the needed info even though you have to read a lot. Congratulations on that! Do not base your opinion on whatever one person or another (that you don't even know...) will say about it. Not that their experience would not be reliable, but just to make sure you really know what you're talking about.

Personally, it helped me a lot: to a point I don't think I'd still be alive being infected with Lyme's disease and its many co-infections.

Others will share with you about their experimentations. But if you are sick and want to treat yourself with purity, do all you can to give it a try. Best of luck!

There is a lot of hype and false information concerning the frequency generators and the zappers.

I have wasted a lot of money believing the description and effects of different zappers.

The fact that specific frequencies can kill / repel a living organism is known and used in others fields :
->The devices to repel ticks and fleas for cats and dogs
->The devices to repel rats, mices from a house
->The devices to repel mosquitos and others insects
->The devices to repel moles from the garden

But as you explained, the effects of a frequency at the exterior of the human body, is different than the effects at the inside of the human body.

For zappers and frequency generators with electrodes, the main problem is that the current always travel through the path of less resistance, and by using electrodes on the hands and the feet, i clearly felt the larvaes moving from my chest to my neck, then to my head (where there is probably less current flowing). If the larvaes can hide themselves from the current, the infection won't be stopped.

For frequency generators emitting radio waves, the question is as you explained : Are the radio waves able to reach the organisms at the interior of the human body ? And if they are, is there enough power to kill the organisms ?

This question has not been answered yet. (to my knowledge)

But if some persons using a F165 have found that it helped, then it is worth to try. However i don't understand why the output voltage is so low (12V ?) It should be around 36V in order to have enough current flowing.

First you have to review your faith in planted garbage like quackwatch. Heck Thimersol is good for you and so is Fluoride according to the same paid shills that make up fake medical studies. Lots of documentation about that right here on CZ.

Introduction to Bioelectronics
http://www.electroherbalism.com/Bioelectronics/index.htm

There is a large amount of evidence that proves frequencies can affect the body in a positive manner.

Please start reading here.
http://www.rife.de/electricity_frequencies_and_cancer.html


All of the studies on that page are real peer-reviewed studies. You can enter their exact titles in quotes into Google search engine, and you will find them on PubMed and other mainstream medical websites.

By far, the most telling study is this one.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19366446


It directly supports Rife's findings.
CONCLUSION: Cancer-related frequencies appear to be tumor-specific and treatment with tumor-specific frequencies is feasible, well tolerated and may have biological efficacy in patients with advanced cancer.

Please beware, however, that there are many charlatans posing as Rife therapists. There are people claiming that their therapy is based on Rife's theories, when it is not. You have to learn to decipher what is baloney and what isn't, and make sure you don't get discouraged from the real Rife theories just because a liar may have fooled you with fake Rife methods.

I do find it important to note that electricity will always cause some harm, no matter what people claim. You do have to be careful with it. Sometimes you have to use a poison to get rid of an even bigger poison.

Either way, this is irrelevant to Rife's actual work. Remember that Rife did not use electricity - he used light (electromagnetism) to transmit his frequencies. Devices that use the name "Rife" yet use raw electricity are not technically Rife machines at all, but they do rely on the same principles - that excessive vibration causes organisms to die in the body.

Here is a very important passage, that all need to read. It is from "Cross Currents" by Dr. Robert Becker, a very famous research scientist and doctor with dozens of published studies to his name. Dr. Clark based some of her work on his writings, and mentions his name by thanking him in her Cure for All Diseases book.

He makes a point about three key ways that electricity can be harmful. I bolded the very important parts.

Page 138, Cross Currents
"First of all, electricity passing through any substance may produce heat. The amount of heat generated depends upon the resistance of the substance and the density of the current flow. For human skin, the rule of thumb is that one milliampere (1 mA) per one square centimeter is just below the level at which cell damage due to heat is produced. Currents in excess of this may not produce perceptible heating, but they may still damage cells.

Second, if the electricity is administered via electrodes made of metal, the positive electrode will give off ions of the metal itself. [Starstruck's note: This means HEAVY METAL POISONING] In many cases, such as with stainless steel electrodes, these ions will be quite toxic to cells. This toxic effect is not limited to the cells in direct contact with the electrode, because the positively charged ions will be electrically repelled by the positive field of the electrode and the driven some distance deeper into the body. [Starstruck's note: This means you are receiving positive ions whenever you touch a positive electrode. Do you know what a charlatan on this forum tells people to do? He tells them to insert a positive DC electrical generator, otherwise known as a zapper, into saltwater, and then drink it! He claims this inserts "negative" ions. Obviously he has no clue about basic principles of electricity! It does the exact opposite - it inserts positive ions into the water.]

Third, with any level of voltage, the water within the tissues will be subjected to electrolysis, a process in which the water molecules are broken apart. In biological tissues, this produces gases, such as hydrogen, that are extremely toxic to cells. The rate at which these gases are produced is proportional to the level of voltage: the higher the voltage, the greater the amount of gas. At low voltages, the circulation of blood and tissue fluids will carry the hydrogen gas away and neutralize it; however, as voltage is increased, a certain level will be reached at which gas production is greater than the ability of the circulation to carry it away. This higher voltage is called the electrolysis level, and it results in the rapid accumulation of hydrogen gas and the death of all cells at the site. In my laboratory we measured the onset of electrolysis in animal tissues using stainless-steel electrodes. We found it to occur at about 1.1 volts - a comparatively low level."

Again, you have to determine whether the benefits outweight the positives. If you take into account the many testimonials on websites like RifeForum.com and many other locations on the web, you can easily come to the conclusion that the benefits do in fact outweight any side-effects that may occur. I believe this, after my experiences with the method. I do, however, disagree with the usage of frequencies above the audio range. They cause overexcitation of the life energy in the body, and make matters much worse. Fortunately most devices claiming to be Rife today use frequencies well below 1000 Hz. If any harmonics from a square wave are created above 20,000 KHz, they are too weak either way to have any effect.

Again, all of these warnings are irrelevant if you stick directly to Rife's method. He used light, not electricity. There are plasma devices that closely mimic this same technique. Use those if you are worried about the harmful effects of electricity.

If you wish to discuss Rife's methodology and get more expert advice on the matter, I highly recommend making an account over at RifeForum.com. Many smart people there, who value the merit of the scientific method and will happily answer your questions.

>- I have read alot of bad stuff about Hulda Clark on places like quackwatch.com and i figure if the stuff that she knew really worked, it would be alot more popular by now.

Perhaps you might want to read a better posting Hulda Clark Quack .

The reason that it is not more popular is because of an extreme effort to suppress information and availability. In Jan. 2006 we were selling zappers at a rate of about 500 a month, or more, and climbing at about 10 to 15 percent a month. We were only one of about 30 companies selling them in the US. After the FDA raid, of which there were no charges, we have dropped to way below that. The specific reason is that we can not make any claims and only present our products for killing germs in water. A great many of our orders go out of the country to places where zappers are not suppressed.

It is extremely difficult to sell something when you can not thoroughly explain the benefits. Currently, about 80 percent of our sales are strictly repeat orders or word of mouth.

>- If you could diagnose people with a sycrometer,

There are far superior products, such as the QXCI/SCIO. FScan, etc. The synchrometer is kludgy and difficult to use.

>- There are people who claim that the frequencies will break open the cell they claim,

See for yourself: http://www.paradevices.com/zapper_works.html


>- find it hard to belive that there is a way to do this in vivo

OK, why do so many people who use certain zapper products have to replinish their intestinal flora?

>- what ... that would do to the rest of the cells in your body

The cells of the human body are immune because the cell membranes of higher organisms are different from cell walls and membranes of lower organisms.

>- just wanted some opinoins is all.

Facts and real evidence are better. Sorry that I can not afford to produce more but tests to provide proof is very expensive.

As an example, a clinical trial with fewer than 12 subjects, to show that the zapper kills germs on the skin can cost $40k to $100k. That is for the trial only.