Re: Rife Frequency 666

 No, it is not wrong.  I am aware of Rife's hypothesis as I have been researching Rife for about 20+ years and I have copies of a lot of his original research notes.  But Rife did not fully understand what his device was really doing.

You obviously are more of a genious than this man.

Maybe a genius, but clearly not a genious.

You actually understand this advanced technology.

Yes I do.  Now if only you could understand it you would not have to respond with insults.

Never the less, he was smart enough to variate his frequencies and see that one set did not kill a pathogen under the microscope, the other did. These were not the same for everything he studied.

You clearly DO NOT understand the Rife hypothesis. Otherwise you would not have made such a ridiculous statement.  The Rife hypothesis was that using a SPECIFIC frequency he could rupture the membrane or wall of a pathogen destroying it.  In other words multiple frequencies were not needed to destroy a pathogen since he was first going in to synch with the resonance of the pathogen then slightly altering that frequency to disrupt the cell causing it to rupture.  So to imply that multiple frequencies were used so that if one did not work the other would is totally ridiculous.  To take this further as I already pointed out the Rife units are working for things that have NOTHING to do with pathogens.  So how do these units work for these things since they do not fall under Rife's hypothesis?  Simple, they work on a level that Rife had not discovered.

By the way Rife was not the first to use frequencies to cure disease.  Tesla,  Moray and Lakhovsky were a few of the researchers using frequencies to cure disease before Rife.  And they all had their own hypotheses as to how the frequencies cured diseases.

They also had different equipment and theories to begin with.

Yes, different equipment, but still using frequencies to cure disease.  The fact that they had different hypotheses is exactly what I was getting to.  None of them really understood how the frequencies were really working.  So thanks for validating my claim.

Unfortunately there is a lot of misconceptions about Rife's research that have been passed around, especially on the internet.  

For example, the claim that Rife had a lot of different frequencies.  

He did, that`s why he said it took him months and months of work under the microscope per organism.

ROTFLMAO!!!!  You just got done saying above that Rife had multiple frequencies so if one did not work another one may kill the organism.  Now you are implying that there are particular frequencies "per organism".  Seems you cannot keep your story straight, which is not surprising since you clearly do not have a clue what you are talking about.

If people took the time to really do the research they would have found that Rife only kept 5 frequencies.  He later dropped two of these because they were found to interfere with the first three frequencies.

So there are three frequencies and how many thousands of pathogenic microbes?  See the problem with your hypothesis yet?  

No problem with it, he didn`t claim to destroy thousands of pathogenic microbes.

Actually there is a flaw with your hypothesis.  Take a look at some of the frequency lists and look at the number of pathogen induced diseases on the list.  For that matter go back and look at Rife's original list.  Again there are many more diseases caused by DIFFERENT pathogens that the 3 frequencies Rife kept.  Thus the same flaw still applies to your hypothesis.  Luckily when we look at how the Rife units really do work we don't have these flaws in what is now a theory.

If each microbe is frequency specific then a different frequency is required for each of these thousands of microbes.  

Sometimes yes, other times there would probably be overlaps.

And again, Rife only kept a total of three frequencies for all the cancers and other diseases he was treating .  But two of the frequencies worked at a much slower rate since they were actually off by one hertz each.  If corrected they are just as effective as the 666hz frequency.

Yet Rife only used three frequencies.  It was Crane that really started adding all the other frequencies after getting out of jail.  And he was selling his units for $7,500.  Nobody is going to pay that for a simple unit putting out one to three frequencies.  Again, they make the units look more high tech and complicated than they need to be to kick the sales price up for more profit.

Yeah, Crane was a douchebag, no argument there.

On the same lines look at the bogus frequency list that is being circulated on the internet and is sold with the Rife units.  

It`s bogus because anyone can come up with numbers and attach them to diseases. And anyone can take a number in old notes and change it.

Which apparently is what happened as these are not the three original Rife frequencies he kept.  And if you look at cancer on these lists they include 42hz, which is a cancer causing frequency.  This is why I do not follow these bogus lists at all and stick to one of the three frequencies that Rife actually kept.

If you look under cancer there is what 15-20 DIFFERENT frequencies.  So you really think that there are 15-20 pathogens causing the cancer all at the same time?  

Frequency specific is within a range of one to twenty million I believe. Fifteen to twenty different frequencies out of twenty million to break down a pathogen isn`t really a big deal, but it`s enough to maintain variation.

LOL!!!  One to twenty million?  Being that the highest frequencies are somewhere around 20,000hz this means that every number between 1 and 20,000,000hz would be specific to every pathogen according to your hypothesis.

Same applies to other diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS).  MS is caused from human herpes virus type 6.  And how many different frequencies are listed on the bogus frequency list to destroy this one pathogen?

And how do you explain how the Rife units are dealing successfully with non-pathogen related conditions such as nerve regeneration and pain?  Again there was a lot more to the frequency therapy than Rife understood.

I don't deny the possibility of other theraputic effects of the bulb. But it doesn`t change anything, Rife was attempting to kill microorganisms. The research is starting to show he was actually doing that. 

This was demonstrated in cultures.  So what?  This does not mean it is the primary means of curing a disease or treating anything else. 

And what would the odds be that the three frequencies that Rife actually kept would just happen to be related?  Well that is if the last two were adjusted by one to make them accurate.  It was the fact that they were off by one that made them work so much slower than 666hz.  If adjusted by one to the proper frequencies they would work just as well as the 666hz.

My point stands, the data from the past has been manipulated, some of it lost and some of it intact. This leaves an atmosphere of confusion. 

Not at all.  Much of Rife's original notes still exist and if people actually read these then they would know for a fact that Rife only kept the three frequencies.  And again, these are all related, and all three do the same exact job on multiple diseases, although two are slower because they are off by one hertz each.  No, specific frequency for different diseases as some people keep falsely claiming.

And finally, how do you explain that we have seen the one frequency, 666hz, work on everything we have tried it on, which includes various cancers, MS, MD, neuropathies, memory loss after brain surgery, chronic fatigue, etc?  No need for any other frequencies, and no pathogens involved in some of these conditions yet the one frequency worked for all of them.

I explain it by saying there is more to do with this therapy than just killing microbes, but that doesn`t mean that the technology can`t be used to kill specific organisms because the research is starting to show that it can. When it comes to this beloved six six six occult frequency, I wouldn`t be suprised if it was effective. But whether you know it or not, your objective is to get people to toss the microscope out the window. That I will not allow.

We are not discussing the microscope, we are talking about the Rife units.  It is not the microscope that does the healing, it is the frequency units.  People can use a microscope to look at pathogenic staphylococcus bacteria, but this is not going to treat the infection!