Hey HV, do you think freq. 666 will also work on fungues like candida and jock itch? If so how long and how often does it normally take to work?
I have never known anyone to use this frequency for fungi. The things I have seen this frequency work for include cancer, multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, fibromyalgia, diabetic neuropathy, pain, etc.
Also, someone once told my 666 is bad for the thymus gland. What are your thoughts on that? Have you ever seen anyone experience side effects with this freq?
No, I have never seen anyone have an adverse effect from this frequency. And I seriously doubt their claim anyway since the frequencies Rife kept are related and worked in a manner that even Rife did not understand. I have gone over this in the past, but again am not really good at explaining it. In short though the frequencies Rife kept were not working by destroying pathogens but rather by retuning the body back to its primary, normal frequency.
No, this is wrong. The idea was to devitalize organisms based on specific frequencies. This could only be proven under microscopes or visible cultures in containers. The concept you're talking about has nothing to do with what Rife claimed he was doing. What he did say that sounded kind of like that was, "Destroying the organism and allowing the body to return to balance." This was technology specifically designed and tested to target individual organisms. The following videos demonstrate proof of concept:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=166985105043992526&hl=en#
Endless nonsense got attached to Rife's name. Prime example is the Rife Forum on curezone.
Remainder of post removed for violating TOS.
No, this is wrong. The idea was to devitalize organisms based on specific frequencies. This could only be proven under microscopes or visible cultures in containers. The concept you're talking about has nothing to do with what Rife claimed he was doing. What he did say that sounded kind of like that was, "Destroying the organism and allowing the body to return to balance." This was technology specifically designed and tested to target individual organisms. The following videos demonstrate proof of concept:
No, it is not wrong. I am aware of Rife's hypothesis as I have been researching Rife for about 20+ years and I have copies of a lot of his original research notes. But Rife did not fully understand what his device was really doing.
By the way Rife was not the first to use frequencies to cure disease. Tesla, Moray and Lakhovsky were a few of the researchers using frequencies to cure disease before Rife. And they all had their own hypotheses as to how the frequencies cured diseases.
Unfortunately there is a lot of misconceptions about Rife's research that have been passed around, especially on the internet. For example, the claim that Rife had a lot of different frequencies. If people took the time to really do the research they would have found that Rife only kept 5 frequencies. He later dropped two of these because they were found to interfere with the first three frequencies.
So there are three frequencies and how many thousands of pathogenic microbes? See the problem with your hypothesis yet? If each microbe is frequency specific then a different frequency is required for each of these thousands of microbes. Yet Rife only used three frequencies. It was Crane that really started adding all the other frequencies after getting out of jail. And he was selling his units for $7,500. Nobody is going to pay that for a simple unit putting out one to three frequencies. Again, they make the units look more high tech and complicated than they need to be to kick the sales price up for more profit.
On the same lines look at the bogus frequency list that is being circulated on the internet and is sold with the Rife units. If you look under cancer there is what 15-20 DIFFERENT frequencies. So you really think that there are 15-20 pathogens causing the cancer all at the same time? Same applies to other diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). MS is caused from human herpes virus type 6. And how many different frequencies are listed on the bogus frequency list to destroy this one pathogen?
And how do you explain how the Rife units are dealing successfully with non-pathogen related conditions such as nerve regeneration and pain? Again there was a lot more to the frequency therapy than Rife understood.
And what would the odds be that the three frequencies that Rife actually kept would just happen to be related? Well that is if the last two were adjusted by one to make them accurate. It was the fact that they were off by one that made them work so much slower than 666hz. If adjusted by one to the proper frequencies they would work just as well as the 666hz.
And finally, how do you explain that we have seen the one frequency, 666hz, work on everything we have tried it on, which includes various cancers, MS, MD, neuropathies, memory loss after brain surgery, chronic fatigue, etc? No need for any other frequencies, and no pathogens involved in some of these conditions yet the one frequency worked for all of them.
This post has been edited to remove poster's insults that are in violation of TOS.
No, it is not wrong. I am aware of Rife's hypothesis as I have been researching Rife for about 20+ years and I have copies of a lot of his original research notes. But Rife did not fully understand what his device was really doing.
You obviously are more of a genious than this man. You actually understand this advanced technology. Never the less, he was smart enough to variate his frequencies and see that one set did not kill a pathogen under the microscope, the other did. These were not the same for everything he studied.
By the way Rife was not the first to use frequencies to cure disease. Tesla, Moray and Lakhovsky were a few of the researchers using frequencies to cure disease before Rife. And they all had their own hypotheses as to how the frequencies cured diseases.
They also had different equipment and theories to begin with.
Unfortunately there is a lot of misconceptions about Rife's research that have been passed around, especially on the internet.
For example, the claim that Rife had a lot of different frequencies.
He did, that`s why he said it took him months and months of work under the microscope per organism.
If people took the time to really do the research they would have found that Rife only kept 5 frequencies. He later dropped two of these because they were found to interfere with the first three frequencies.
So there are three frequencies and how many thousands of pathogenic microbes? See the problem with your hypothesis yet?
No problem with it, he didn`t claim to destroy thousands of pathogenic microbes.
If each microbe is frequency specific then a different frequency is required for each of these thousands of microbes.
Sometimes yes, other times there would probably be overlaps.
Yet Rife only used three frequencies. It was Crane that really started adding all the other frequencies after getting out of jail. And he was selling his units for $7,500. Nobody is going to pay that for a simple unit putting out one to three frequencies. Again, they make the units look more high tech and complicated than they need to be to kick the sales price up for more profit.
Yeah, Crane was a douchebag, no argument there.
On the same lines look at the bogus frequency list that is being circulated on the internet and is sold with the Rife units.
It`s bogus because anyone can come up with numbers and attach them to diseases. And anyone can take a number in old notes and change it.
If you look under cancer there is what 15-20 DIFFERENT frequencies. So you really think that there are 15-20 pathogens causing the cancer all at the same time?
Frequency specific is within a range of one to twenty million I believe. Fifteen to twenty different frequencies out of twenty million to break down a pathogen isn`t really a big deal, but it`s enough to maintain variation.
Same applies to other diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). MS is caused from human herpes virus type 6. And how many different frequencies are listed on the bogus frequency list to destroy this one pathogen?
And how do you explain how the Rife units are dealing successfully with non-pathogen related conditions such as nerve regeneration and pain? Again there was a lot more to the frequency therapy than Rife understood.
I don't deny the possibility of other theraputic effects of the bulb. But it doesn`t change anything, Rife was attempting to kill microorganisms. The research is starting to show he was actually doing that.
And what would the odds be that the three frequencies that Rife actually kept would just happen to be related? Well that is if the last two were adjusted by one to make them accurate. It was the fact that they were off by one that made them work so much slower than 666hz. If adjusted by one to the proper frequencies they would work just as well as the 666hz.
My point stands, the data from the past has been manipulated, some of it lost and some of it intact. This leaves an atmosphere of confusion. One thing is for sure, anyone who says skip the microscopy work, is a sabatour whether they know it or not.
And finally, how do you explain that we have seen the one frequency, 666hz, work on everything we have tried it on, which includes various cancers, MS, MD, neuropathies, memory loss after brain surgery, chronic fatigue, etc? No need for any other frequencies, and no pathogens involved in some of these conditions yet the one frequency worked for all of them.
I explain it by saying there is more to do with this therapy than just killing microbes, but that doesn`t mean that the technology can`t be used to kill specific organisms because the research is starting to show that it can. When it comes to this beloved six six six occult frequency, I wouldn`t be suprised if it was effective. But whether you know it or not, your objective is to get people to toss the microscope out the window. That I will not allow.
No, it is not wrong. I am aware of Rife's hypothesis as I have been researching Rife for about 20+ years and I have copies of a lot of his original research notes. But Rife did not fully understand what his device was really doing.
You obviously are more of a genious than this man.
Maybe a genius, but clearly not a genious.
You actually understand this advanced technology.
Yes I do. Now if only you could understand it you would not have to respond with insults.
Never the less, he was smart enough to variate his frequencies and see that one set did not kill a pathogen under the microscope, the other did. These were not the same for everything he studied.
You clearly DO NOT understand the Rife hypothesis. Otherwise you would not have made such a ridiculous statement. The Rife hypothesis was that using a SPECIFIC frequency he could rupture the membrane or wall of a pathogen destroying it. In other words multiple frequencies were not needed to destroy a pathogen since he was first going in to synch with the resonance of the pathogen then slightly altering that frequency to disrupt the cell causing it to rupture. So to imply that multiple frequencies were used so that if one did not work the other would is totally ridiculous. To take this further as I already pointed out the Rife units are working for things that have NOTHING to do with pathogens. So how do these units work for these things since they do not fall under Rife's hypothesis? Simple, they work on a level that Rife had not discovered.
By the way Rife was not the first to use frequencies to cure disease. Tesla, Moray and Lakhovsky were a few of the researchers using frequencies to cure disease before Rife. And they all had their own hypotheses as to how the frequencies cured diseases.
They also had different equipment and theories to begin with.
Yes, different equipment, but still using frequencies to cure disease. The fact that they had different hypotheses is exactly what I was getting to. None of them really understood how the frequencies were really working. So thanks for validating my claim.
Unfortunately there is a lot of misconceptions about Rife's research that have been passed around, especially on the internet.
For example, the claim that Rife had a lot of different frequencies.
He did, that`s why he said it took him months and months of work under the microscope per organism.
ROTFLMAO!!!! You just got done saying above that Rife had multiple frequencies so if one did not work another one may kill the organism. Now you are implying that there are particular frequencies "per organism". Seems you cannot keep your story straight, which is not surprising since you clearly do not have a clue what you are talking about.
If people took the time to really do the research they would have found that Rife only kept 5 frequencies. He later dropped two of these because they were found to interfere with the first three frequencies.
So there are three frequencies and how many thousands of pathogenic microbes? See the problem with your hypothesis yet?
No problem with it, he didn`t claim to destroy thousands of pathogenic microbes.
Actually there is a flaw with your hypothesis. Take a look at some of the frequency lists and look at the number of pathogen induced diseases on the list. For that matter go back and look at Rife's original list. Again there are many more diseases caused by DIFFERENT pathogens that the 3 frequencies Rife kept. Thus the same flaw still applies to your hypothesis. Luckily when we look at how the Rife units really do work we don't have these flaws in what is now a theory.
If each microbe is frequency specific then a different frequency is required for each of these thousands of microbes.
Sometimes yes, other times there would probably be overlaps.
And again, Rife only kept a total of three frequencies for all the cancers and other diseases he was treating . But two of the frequencies worked at a much slower rate since they were actually off by one hertz each. If corrected they are just as effective as the 666hz frequency.
Yet Rife only used three frequencies. It was Crane that really started adding all the other frequencies after getting out of jail. And he was selling his units for $7,500. Nobody is going to pay that for a simple unit putting out one to three frequencies. Again, they make the units look more high tech and complicated than they need to be to kick the sales price up for more profit.
Yeah, Crane was a douchebag, no argument there.
On the same lines look at the bogus frequency list that is being circulated on the internet and is sold with the Rife units.
It`s bogus because anyone can come up with numbers and attach them to diseases. And anyone can take a number in old notes and change it.
Which apparently is what happened as these are not the three original Rife frequencies he kept. And if you look at cancer on these lists they include 42hz, which is a cancer causing frequency. This is why I do not follow these bogus lists at all and stick to one of the three frequencies that Rife actually kept.
If you look under cancer there is what 15-20 DIFFERENT frequencies. So you really think that there are 15-20 pathogens causing the cancer all at the same time?
Frequency specific is within a range of one to twenty million I believe. Fifteen to twenty different frequencies out of twenty million to break down a pathogen isn`t really a big deal, but it`s enough to maintain variation.
LOL!!! One to twenty million? Being that the highest frequencies are somewhere around 20,000hz this means that every number between 1 and 20,000,000hz would be specific to every pathogen according to your hypothesis.
Same applies to other diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). MS is caused from human herpes virus type 6. And how many different frequencies are listed on the bogus frequency list to destroy this one pathogen?
And how do you explain how the Rife units are dealing successfully with non-pathogen related conditions such as nerve regeneration and pain? Again there was a lot more to the frequency therapy than Rife understood.
I don't deny the possibility of other theraputic effects of the bulb. But it doesn`t change anything, Rife was attempting to kill microorganisms. The research is starting to show he was actually doing that.
This was demonstrated in cultures. So what? This does not mean it is the primary means of curing a disease or treating anything else.
And what would the odds be that the three frequencies that Rife actually kept would just happen to be related? Well that is if the last two were adjusted by one to make them accurate. It was the fact that they were off by one that made them work so much slower than 666hz. If adjusted by one to the proper frequencies they would work just as well as the 666hz.
My point stands, the data from the past has been manipulated, some of it lost and some of it intact. This leaves an atmosphere of confusion.
Not at all. Much of Rife's original notes still exist and if people actually read these then they would know for a fact that Rife only kept the three frequencies. And again, these are all related, and all three do the same exact job on multiple diseases, although two are slower because they are off by one hertz each. No, specific frequency for different diseases as some people keep falsely claiming.
And finally, how do you explain that we have seen the one frequency, 666hz, work on everything we have tried it on, which includes various cancers, MS, MD, neuropathies, memory loss after brain surgery, chronic fatigue, etc? No need for any other frequencies, and no pathogens involved in some of these conditions yet the one frequency worked for all of them.
I explain it by saying there is more to do with this therapy than just killing microbes, but that doesn`t mean that the technology can`t be used to kill specific organisms because the research is starting to show that it can. When it comes to this beloved six six six occult frequency, I wouldn`t be suprised if it was effective. But whether you know it or not, your objective is to get people to toss the microscope out the window. That I will not allow.
We are not discussing the microscope, we are talking about the Rife units. It is not the microscope that does the healing, it is the frequency units. People can use a microscope to look at pathogenic staphylococcus bacteria, but this is not going to treat the infection!
Maybe not, but I am not going to waste time eidting out your insults, which are not allowed. So I will simply erase your posts as you post since you cannot behave and you are already showing by your above statement that you have no intention of doing so.
'666' couldn't be more frank, right?? There is obviously some sort of spiritual connection involved with this device.
religious fanatic.. who the hell are you to say that? I've never met you nor have you met me. Is it no coincidence Hitler attacked and persecuted Christians?!? or that the blame was put upon specifically Christians during the reign of Roman emperor Nero????
Do you see the trend????????? I'm sorry that you cannot connect the dots as effectively as I can.
religious fanatic.. who the hell are you to say that? I've never met you nor have you met me. Is it no coincidence Hitler attacked and persecutedChristians?!? or that the blame was put upon specifically Christians during the reign of Roman emperor Nero????
Do you see the trend????????? I'm sorry that you cannot connect the dots as effectively as I can.
I have no intention of making this forum about religion. So I want to re-emphasize that the 666hz frequency has NOTHING to about spirituality. If that were the case then how would this apply to the other two frequencies Rife kept, which have no connection to any religion at all? The only reason we stuck to using the 666hz frequency is because it was the only accurate frequency Rife had. Again the other two frequencies he kept worked, but much slower since both were actually off by one hertz each. Again, the frequency has NOTHING to do with any religious connection. We will leave that with the Hollywood fantasy garbage.
You brought that totally out of context. Triple digit repeat numbers are renowned in the occult/mystery schools. You assumed that said individual actually had a superstition over these numbers. All they noted was a possible spiritual connection. And they were not incorrect in doing so. The definition you provided, can't be proven based on this person's statement alone. Now if they said something like, "I would never run six six six on a frequency machine, devils would get into me!" Then your reply would have been warranted.
'666' couldn't be more frank, right?? There is obviously some sort of spiritual connection involved with this device.
Not at all. Most of the 666 hype has more to do with Hollywood than reality.
"Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six." Revelation 13:18
... still "Hollywood fantasy garbage" ???
"Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six." Revelation 13:18
... still "Hollywood fantasy garbage" ???
Yes, it is. There are all sorts of hypotheses of what 666 means including that these refer to letters, "W" to be specific for "WWW". So which hypothesis is right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_Beast
Hollywood was responsible though for making the whole 666 thing popular as the symbol for the Devil.
And I am not going to get in to a religious debate, but if you know about the Bible then you know:
1. There are literally hundreds of different Bibles.
2. The Bible has been rewritten and altered by man over and over and over and over...... The Bible was supposedly based on the information within the Dead Sea Scrolls. Yet translation of the Dead Sea Scrolls is showing the Bible is not even close to what what the modern Bible states. For fun look up what the original 10 Commandments really were. They are quite a bit different from what we have learned. And look up how many different versions of Genesis there are. Some Bibles even have more than one version within the same Bible.
3. How many "Books" were left out of the Bible. The churches picked and chose what Books were to be allowed in the Bible to begin with then rewrote each of the included Books to fit their individual needs. Especially when it came to things like the Spanish Inquisition and the Holy Wars so they could justify their killing of people and control.
From what I understand, the most viable source of any bible is a direct translation version. Is that correct?
I also know that the name of God is a Tetragrammaton, YHWH.
The original 10 Commandments....can you please post a source for this?
The Dead Sea Scrolls were housed in the Rockefeller Museum at one point....Go figure!
Our course the Creator understands fully what has happened to the Bible and anyone who has the true intention of getting to read and understand his works are judged by that, regardless of what they know about the truth.
From what I understand, the most viable source of any bible is a direct translation version. Is that correct?
Pretty much. But not all words translate properly between languages, and as I pointed out the Bible has been "tampered" with quite a bit by man.
I also know that the name of God is a Tetragrammaton, YHWH.
The original 10 Commandments....can you please post a source for this?
The History Channel has done quite a few stories on the different versions of the Bible. I think that is where they discussed the original 10 Commandments.
The Dead Sea Scrolls were housed in the Rockefeller Museum at one point....Go figure!
Our course the Creator understands fully what has happened to the Bible and anyone who has the true intention of getting to read and understand his works are judged by that, regardless of what they know about the truth.
There are two things that I am really not in to debating since they can lead to hard feelings between friends. Those are religion and politics. So I prefer to keep both out of this forum.