CureZone   Log On   Join
Re:
 
parazapper Views: 11,058
Published: 15 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,726,352

Re:


I am not trying to start a debate either, was only trying to provide relevant information.

As I stated: >- The overall success in eliminating Ascaris with zappers is marginal, about 60 percent.

This was based on acrual customer responses from customers that had ascaris. The issue that I presented is the question of why it does not work every time. I believe that it is due to the high degree of frequency tolerance in standard zappers that use an R-C oscillator.

The newer zappers from ParaZapper and M-Zap use microprocessore to generate a more accurate frequency output. If the right frequency is found, then these should be more effective. Sadly, I am no longer allowed to collect data for human usage.

>- describe the zapper like the solution to all infections and it is not !

I agree, but, the state of the art is getting closer. This is why I spend so much tiime developing new products such as the MX, AV, the new UZI, and the upcoming MY. Each is intended to be better than the previous and so far, this has been found to be true.

More frequencies and more accurate frequencies increases the chance of hitting the exact frequency needed for any particular application.

As for the affiliates, I agree with what you are saying. I am an affiliate with Amazon, but I only promote books that I consider relevant and worthwhile.

 

Share


 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2025  www.curezone.org

0.484 sec, (1)