Re: Blood Electrification current density in the artery

First, the way you talk about dr. Robert Beck clearly shows your attitude, I think you’re losing your temper.

Second, you may try to discredit Bob clinical research, but he was a physician with Ph.D. and obviously he knew better what methodology is needed to measure current flowing inside the arteries. He did his research and brought the data. You never did. You can only google skin resistance and misinterpret it.

The main difference between Bob and you is, apart from knowledge, that he had nothing to sell. But you are making and selling your crippled devices, this is your business. I understand that you must be VERY nervous and confused, as your mistake puts your device in question.

You tried on this forum to give the links to your „shop” full of biased comparisons to other devices. Your messages were deleted by moderators, guess why???

Then, your paper is right, but it’s about skin impedance on different parts of the body, not about human tissues in vivo.

Finally, stop spreading nonsense about muscles resistance being 600x greater than blood (under DC or low frequency – which is typical for Beck-like devices). Here is a table for you.





Reference:
Applied bioelectricity:
from electrical stimulations to electropathology
Springer, 1998 - 563 Tweet