Re: anyone hear here?!

what i don't understand is that the ant-flush contingent claims that the flushes do not work. fine and dandy.

but then they go on to say that the flushes are dangerous.

how can something that supposedly does not work be dangerous?

this is one of the many obvious contradictions in their logic. in one of their posts one of them even warned me not to point out their contradictions because it would be considered abuse!

then they say that the sphincter of oddi cannot dilate enough to let stones pass through. so if the sphincter cannot dilate sufficiently to let stones pass, then there is no danger at all. at least the pro-flush people are aware that stones do in fact pass, and because of this there is a small amount of risk involved -- which can be rectified by repeating the flush at sooner than the recommended two week interval.

furthermore, like you said, the danger is always posted from responsible websites and here on curezone. there is danger in almost every protocol, allopathic and alternative.

when i first started the flushes i was very scared about stones becoming stuck and i even considered having a backup plan of surgery in case something did go wrong. luckily that never happened to me despite passing some extremely large stones; i think it was shortly after that that the whites of my eyes became completely white like they had been when i was a child and all of my blood Sugar problems disappeared and my dry skin completely healed and numerous food allergies disappeared and i didn't need to take any supplements or herbs anymore and and and...



Tweet