CureZone   Log On   Join
Image Embedded Re: Sporotrichosis
 
wombat Views: 13,927
Published: 15 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,647,951

Re: Sporotrichosis


Mike, if you do a search in google books(public domain), you can find plenty of anti-iodine sentiment & also plenty of reports of adverse reactions. One of these days I'll dig some of them up. The GOOD reports far outweigh the "bad".

Yes, I am sure that people were less "toxic" then, as in not saturated with bromide and fluoride as they are now...

Here's a post I did a while back on the roots of iodophobia...

Image Embedded The Roots of Iodophobia~ sensational journalism.     ~RN by wombat   21 mon  1,085  Iodine Supplementati
      
      
Ban wombat from   THIS Forum 
Un-Ban wombat from   THIS Forum
Subject:   The Roots of Iodophobia~ sensational journalism.
Username:   wombat     contact wombat     email wombat
Date:   10/19/2008 11:51:56 AM   ( 21 mon ago )
Hits:   1088 
Size: 7598 char.   URL:   http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1280284
Replies:   27
Status:       ~RN [Message recommended by a moderator!]
Edit This Message Edit this message by using a plain text editor Edit this message by using an advanced HTML text processor called FCK Edit this message by using an advanced HTML text processor called Tiny MCE
This is my avatar. Click here to see my profile.
wombat

Along with the well-documented Wolf-Chaikoff effect, we find an abundance of News stories from the 1920's re: Iodine POISONING, iodine SUICIDE, iodine used as a WEAPON, EVIL iodine added to bootleg liquor as a colorant. "Hysterical" women and girls seemed to be particularly vulnerable to the allure of EVIL IODINE, and were prone to drinking it as an attempt to commit suicide.
In my searching, most of the news stories say nothing about people actually dying from ingestion. I did come across one, but it's not free to view...
So, what went on here? The health benefits of iodine were well-known in the early part of this century. How is it that for a brief period in American History Iodine was demonized?
We certainly see how the mass media can control the thoughts of people. *I read it in the newspaper, therefore it must be true*
Was this an early example of manipulating public opinion?

............................................


http://members.aye.net/~gharris/blog/bookjunkie.jpg


Girl Visitor Drinks Iodine! ~1920


http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9806E6DB1E3DE533A25754C0A96...


............................................

Woman drinks Iodine on Doorstep of Man who accused her of Robbery! ~1922


http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9506E1D71F39EF3ABC4952DFB76...


................................................

Scolded, She Drinks Iodine! ~1922


http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9907E1D61630E433A2575BC2A96...


....................................................

Takes Poison in Church, Girl's screams after Swallowing Poison Startle Holy Trinity Parishioners! ~1921


http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9407E5D8153CE533A25750C2A96...


.....................................................

Says He Threw Iodine! ~1921


http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9900E4D7173EEE3ABC4E52DFBE6...


.......................................................

'TIRED OF LIFE,' TRIES TO DIE; Girl Collapses After Taking Iodine, but Will Recover.! ~1922


http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=950CE2DD1339EF3ABC4F53DFBE6...


..................................................

Athlete Near Death from Taking Poison! ~1922


http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9A03E3D91E3EEE3ABC4851DFB76...


.....................................................

GIRL FOUND POISONED.; Sailors Rescue Sufferer From Iodine on Riverside Drive. ! ~1922


http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9504E7DA1531EF33A25750C1A96...


...............................................

IODINE used in bootleg LIQUOR


http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9404E4DD1E3EEE3ABC4A52DFB56...



http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9F01E0D81E3CE533A2575BC2A96...


::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Guy Abraham, MD, on Medical Iodophobia:


http://www.optimox.com/pics/Iodine/IOD-16/PUB_16.htm


...Before World War II, non-radioactive forms of inorganic iodine were considered a panacea for all human ills,10 but today, they are avoided by physicians like leprosy. Who and/or what killed iodine?

The first nail in the iodine coffin was the publication by Wolff and Chaikoff from UC Berkley in 1948,11 describing their findings in rats administered Iodide in increasing amounts by intraperitoneal injection. When serum inorganic iodide levels reached 0.2 mg/L, that is 10-6M, radioiodide uptake by the thyroid gland became undetectable. The correct interpretation would be: Iodide sufficiency of the thyroid gland was achieved when serum inorganic iodide levels reach 10-6M, as we previously discussed.9 But Wolff and Chaikoff concluded that serum inorganic iodide levels at a concentration of 10-6M blocks the synthesis of thyroid hormones, resulting in hypothyroidism and goiter. These authors did not measure thyroid hormones in the rats studied. Hypothyroidism and goiter were not observed in those rats. This fictitious phenomenon became known as the Wolff-Chaikoff effect.12

The second and final nail in the iodine coffin was hammered in by Wolff in 1969.12 By 1969, Dr. Wolff had moved to the National Institute of Health. He arbitrarily defined four levels of “iodine excess.” The first level of excess started with intake above 0.2 mg/day, and iodide intake of 2 mg or more was considered “excessive and potentially harmful.” By the 1970s, physicians concluded that one must avoid inorganic, non-radioactive iodine like leprosy, unless it was incorporated into toxic, organic iodine-containing drugs. Then iodine could be tolerated because iodine could be blamed for the toxicity of these drugs.

Whereas the first wave of medical iodophobia was initiated in 1910 by the pen of one man, Swiss surgeon, Nobel laureate, Professor Theodore Kocher and lasted some 15 years (1910-1925),1 the second wave of medical iodophobia initiated in 1948 by the pen of two men, Wolff and Chaikoff, is alive and well even after some 60 years of existence.

As unbelievable as it may sound, the Kocher iodophobic effect was initiated by a report from Kocher one year after he received the Nobel Prize, stating that he had experienced symptoms of hyperthyroidism following ingestion of potassium iodide. One man, reporting his experience using iodine on himself initiated the first wave of medical iodophobia. After 15 years of intimidation, preventing the widespread effective use of iodine, due to the Kocher iodophobic effect, physicians were able to escape from the Kocher inhibition because of poor synchronization of iodophobic publications and a small nucleus of enlightened members of the medical profession. The amazing success and long duration of the Wolff-Chaikoff iodophobic effect on the medical community is most likely due to the well-synchronized timing of a series of iodophobic publications and also due to iodine deprived and zombified physicians who were unable to escape from the Wolff-Chaikoff effect. The rats used in the Wolff-Chaikoff experiment were successful in escaping the Wolff-Chaikoff effect because they received significant amounts of iodine, improving their cognition..."

Printer-friendly version of this page
Email this message to a friend
Bookmark this page/Add to Favorites or press Ctrl+D
Alert Webmaster & Moderators
Already alerted!  Already alerted!
How do you feel about this message?     Agree     Disagree       Hide this question
Reply to This Message   Post a Reply to this message by using a plain text editor  Post a Reply to this message by using an advanced HTML text processor called FCK  Post a Reply to this message by using an advanced HTML text processor called Tiny MCE
 

Manage Email Notifications: Subscribe or Unsubscribe

The Privacy Manager for wombat

Find & Order All Messages Posted by wombat
  by  
DISCLAIMER / WARNING Important Disclaimer!
Answers, comments and opinions provided on CureZone are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. CureZone does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in messages, comments or articles on CureZone. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published hereRead more ...
 

Share


 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2025  www.curezone.org

0.109 sec, (12)