CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Various protocols, herbs, sups, et cet.
 
Hveragerthi Views: 4,282
Published: 15 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,512,548

Re: Various protocols, herbs, sups, et cet.


 >>Beck Protocol (blood electrification/silver pulser)

>>Beck's machine is just a poor quality knock off of the Rife technology.

Not at all my understanding. Was referring to blood electrification. Not disagreeing, just surprised by your response.

In a way it is electrification. But is through frequency. Rife's primary frequency was 666hz. Beck chose .666hz.

>>And they do not put out enough power to produce a true silver colloid.

Perhaps. Tastes like the real stuff to me. Then again - not sure I've ever found any true colloidal silver.

 

It will create silver particles, just not in a size to make them colloidal. Colloids will stay in suspension without assistance from stabilizers. With low power the silver separates from the electrodes, but the particles are so large that they will settle out in time. So they are not true colloids.

>>FIR therapy (sauna/lamp)

>>I really don't see any way this would get rid of Candida.

They (manufacturers/distributers) sure make claims that it does. Also - not referring to Candida necessarily. Other molds (tropical).

 

I would like to see them provide proof to this within the human body. Heat sources can be used to kill molds, but this does not mean that they will work in a living body. I can use a blowtorch to kill mold and it will be 100% effective, but I would not recommend this for the human body. So how did they come to their conclusion that it kills mold? Did they put some mold in a petri dish then expose the mold to far IR? This is why we have to be careful of claims. There are many ways to come up with methods to prove a vague claim. Kills mold is a vague claim. Kills mold in living human bodies is a specific claim that needs more proof.

>>Frequency (Once you mentioned the body's natural freq. Can you restate? Also, do you have any faith in Rife technology - minus the CAFL as a guide?)

>>Yes I have been working with Rife technology for nearly 2 decades. It works really well when the proper frequency is used. You do not need a bunch of different frequencies. Rife only kept 3 frequencies and two of them worked but much more slowly than the 666hz frequency. The reason the other two worked slower is that they were off by one. With all the success of 666hz on so many different diseases and conditions we have stuck to this single frequency. There is a basis for this that I am not very good at explaining and that Rife was unaware of. It was my father that figured out the link between the three frequencies and the body's primary frequency.

I read that Rife used two frequencies simultaneously - and this was the buried secret (one of them), stolen by his colleague/assistant. Thanks for the insight.

 

Rife only kept 3 frequencies. He had 2 others but they interfered with the first 3, so he dropped the last 2. Two of the remaining three frequencies are off by one, which makes them work much slower. If corrected they will work just as well, and all three of the frequencies will have a direct connection to the body's primary frequency. The long 11 page frequency list, which I strongly believe is bogus came out way after Rife's death. In fact these lists came with the Crane units. Crane was Rife's second partner, the one that went to prison. When he got out of prison he went to Mexico and started manufacturing these units. I know someone who bought one and they were $7500 at the time and that is when I first saw the long frequency list. What I found most surprising was that one of the frequencies for cancer was 42hz, which is the frequency for formaldehyde, a cancer causing frequency. Bottom line is that all the frequencies are not needed anyway. The 666hz frequency works on everything we have tried it for. You do not need different frequencies for different diseases and conditions. All the other frequencies do is to raise the cost of the machine by making it sound more high tech.

>>Olive leaf extract

>>This is an herb I have never really worked with. Prior to it becoming very popular in the AIDS community about a decade ago its primary use was as a sedative. Then it was reported in an AIDS newsletter to work against the HIV virus and next thing you know it was being promoted for all sorts of infections. But the preparation was long and slow, not just a simple steeped tea. So I have stuck with easier to use herbs that I had seen work very well.

In other words - your work primarily involves bulk herbs. Is Chaparral your "choice" anti-fungal?

Actually my favorite antifungals are pau d' arco, black walnut hull and thyme.

 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.141 sec, (3)