When debate becomes innuendo, reason flees out the door

Actually we have debated everything Rudi has posted ad nauseum, including going to some of the websites he copied and pasted from and finding that the large majority of the posters there, including minorities who have known and worked for Ron Paul, disagree with the conclusions he has reached.

Once again, why is it that virtually no major politician of any color and no major figure of any color has condemned Ron Paul for being a racist?  Why is it that his colleagues in Congress consider him to be one of the most honest and principled members?  Where is the racism in the articles we know for certain he has authored or in his speeches?

Rudi refuses to call it debate when others disagree and when they do disagree he labels them as racists who want a civil war and/or have a bullet for anyone who is brown, a Muslim, etc.  Is THAT what he considers debate?  I call it and the continued bashing of a guy who will never be President a fixation.

Maybe we should have our own vote.  How many people here are in favor of a civil war based on race?  Who amongst us has a bullet for anyone based on their skin color, religious beliefs, politidal beliefs or sexual preferences?  Not me,  Never have and never will, no matter how many labels are applied.

First it was Ron Paul the racist.  Now it is Ron Paul the controlled opposition of the NWO despite an entire career that says just the opposite.  If he were the controlled opposition, then why did the NWO controlled media have such a coordinated effort to trivialize him and hide his message?

What next - are we who continue to support the bulk of his actual message and actual deeds going to be labeled secret NWO operatives or reptilian shape shifters who have our own secret Bohemian Grove meetups where we cavort naked and worship a giant owl?

I don't hate anyone or any group, though I surely do hate some people's actions.

DQ