Re: Freemason Ron Paul hidden agenda - EDIT

I have seen no proof that Ron Paul is a Mason, but have to admit that the fact that both his wife and his daughter are in organizations closely tied to Masons indicate some pretty heavy ties at the least. The lastest theories about evil handsigns may be making much about nothing.  Dr. Paul, who is arthritic in his hands, was giving the universal sign language signal for love (thumb extended out) rather than the satanic symble with thumb crossed over.  And the kind of hand grasp identified as a secret symbol is also a common one that I bet most people have used when they have to stretch out to grasp someone's hand.

Now, the site you referred to may or may not be right about Ron Paul, but it is nevertheless an apologist site for Freemasonry that glosses over or leaves out important information.  On the one hand it talks about how people openly sign up for Masonry as if that is somehow proof that it is not a secretive organization, and yet it says nothing about all the secret rites and rituals of Free Masonry.

The site has a listing of famous Masonic "black sheep", yet does not list Albert Pike, a truly evil Satanist who engaged in orgies with young boys, likely was involved in human sacrifice and was an early NWO leader?  What a convenient omission!

Nor does it have much to say about the world of difference between ordinary Free Masons and those who ascend to the 33rd and higher levels.  I bet you want ever see a pro-Mason site print or admit the truth about the rituals involved before and after becoming a 33rd degree Mason.  They are quite horrific.

There are a very large number of well meaning, civic minded Free Masons.  In fact, few of the members below the 33rd degree even know what Freemasonry is about at the upper levels.  Apparently - and my sources are very, very good - above the 32nd Degree, at least in some of the groups, the twisted truth is revealed and it is quite simply evil.

You know, Ron Paul has made mistakes.  Letting those newsletters go out in his name and claiming to not know what they contained rings hollow with me because it happened for 20 years, he made a lot of money from them and his wife and daughter were on the payroll for several years.  No way you do not know what was going in under those circumstances, in my opinion.  But he did accept moral responsibility and what keeps me from believing he is a tool of the NWO or any other group is that his record and message have been consistent, though some continue to wrongly ascribe racism to votes made on constitutional grounds (and I can see why given the content of the ill advised newsletters).  Nevertheless, what Paul votes for and what he advocates - such as the abolishment of the Fed, end to wars and return of liberties - is so against the NWO agenda that to me it is a much longer reach than some of thosed stretched out handshakes to portray him as an agent of the NWO.

DQ