Re: Freemason Ron Paul hidden agenda - EDIT

OK, InCH - ya got me there.  I was not one of those young boys Pike buggered in the woods.  Or maybe he didn't.

Maybe there's hope for you yet.

And actually you do have a good way of finding out, but it would require you to take a look outside the apologists propaganda and look at what non-apologists have to say, compare the two and make a judgment.

Rudenski supplied all the propaganda sites that provided all the lynch mob mentality.

In many instance I am afraid that the same cannot be said about those above the 32nd degree.  I am still chilled by memories of a report from what I consider an unimpeachable source of a 33rd Degree Mason father's deathbed confession to his son.  Why would a father lie to his son and warn him away from Freemasonry with descriptions of the ritual of spitting on the cross and disavowing Christ, revelations that beyond the 32nd degree the Masons worship Baal and that one of the initiation rites involved human sacrifice (they took a drunk homeless person, tied him to the railroad track and watched him be cut into by the train)?

No, I was not there either - but I have no doubt that what was described was true and that it is unlikely to have been an isolated incidence.

Possibly true, but not necessarily the way every 33rd degree masonic member acted. How many innocent drifters in texas was hanged from the nearest tree because they strayed across some ranchers land who had a steer killed a week or two earlier. no actual connection, but what the hey, this guys available, and a steer was lost. No reason to think he MIGHT be innocent, Right?

Hoo boy, InCh - you're leaving yourself wide open with that one, given some of the stuff you posted during the height of the debate over the election farce between the illegal alien and his old guard running mate and the designated washed up runner up and his publicity stunt running mate!  Can we just agree that some of the stuff you posted was not quite irrefutable? LOL!

I may have posted an article, or a video that stated one thing or another, but I personally didn't make any accusations stating my personal knowledge about someone. You do this all the time.  You are free to make your own determination as to the validity of what I post.

You did this with my post about the masons, then added your personal knowledge of orgies with young boys, and sacrifices by Pike.

Giving somebody the benefit of the doubt isn't rocket science. You are free to think what you want, but go over the line if you state it as fact with out irrefutable proof to back it up.

I certainly hope this doesn't change your mind about liking me. LOL