Re: Your last two posts

I have read a few of your posts. Some of them are full of good, even great information.

I have, what I believe, is a small area of disagreement with you based primarily on a few things such as individual variability and need;

An Inuit, will not be able to tolerate the diet of a Yanomamo and vis versa. This is an extreme example, however, given individual ancestry, we will all vary, at least, some what in environmental and dietary need for optimum life\performance, among other things.

and, individual variability based upon environmental exposure, not the least of which would be occupational exposure (mad as a hatter), our needs will also vary, even within families.

Environmental exposure includes exposure to synthetics and concentrated "natural" chemicals, due in large part to any work that must be done, and resources expended, in order to utilize and\or eliminate these synthetics to any degree... again here, some will tolerate and handle this effort more effectively than others.

Articles and valid research points to this issue;

http://eap.mcgill.ca/MagRack/JPR/JPR_17.htm

http://ajrccm.atsjournals.org/cgi/content/full/165/5/683

http://www.radoslawspiewak.net/2001-1a.htm

a bit of an individuals story...

http://www.getipm.com/articles/farmer.html

Obviously, the applicator will see greater exposure and damage over time than anyone else... unless, they tend to have adaptive traits that make them better able to handle the exposure - this variability does exist.

That a plant or a human can take a synthetic and utilize it, does not mean that it comes without cost to the host.

I can agree to disagree with you and leave it at that. I can also discard old learned knowledge unlearning, and then learning and grasping onto new ideas if need be.

Carry on :-)

grz-

Tweet