Re: Sour Grapes...

Oh we get it. You're a guy. Sometimes it's hard to resolve the Northern part of your body with your southern area.

While you are secretly jacking off to Sarah, she is will take away so many rights from women, it's breathtaking. But perhaps you really don't care about women. I'm a woman, and I care deeply about my rights for my gender.

She's not Truman, she's more like Dan Quayle. All you have to do is listen to her speak. She speaks well (as far as diction) but there is no real content. She makes overwhelmingly stupid remarks about policies and things that most people in her potential position are well versed about. She is not traveled or worldly. She has a very very narrow view of the problems we are facing in this country (and internationally). All she has is her diction, and her boobs. That's it, literally.

She believes in teaching children that man walked with dinosauers......Wow, that's nuts. Basically I would say that makes her very dimwitted, or possibly dangerously insane.

She's going to tell horny teenagers....Oh just don't do it! I remember another female in the whitehouse that said "just say no"......it's all platitudes. Kids are way smarter than that, unless they are not armed with good, basic information like what genitalia does..and that's how babies are born...duh.

I hope she doesn't ban all the books I like.

The ego on that woman is amazing. I am frozen in horror every time I see her smug face, so pleased with her current situation. She has screwed so many people in her professional past. Perhaps you see that as an honorable thing? I certainly do not.

I am a woman, and I might have voted for Hillary, but Sarah Pallin is not someone I'd hold up as an example of my gender. No way, no Sarah.