Re: Your cooked up logic

All info is derived from the CDC a pro-vaccine source. The historical data used is collected with that purpose. Even the objective of the study has the pretense that disease is preventable through vaccination. This does not take into account the long term effects, the intergenerational effects, or environmental effects. In short they looked at the data they wanted to make the study work out for their planned conclusion.
Just like baking a cake.

Your "AltMed School of Paranoia" shows your ignorance of the stated goals of the CDC.
And the greater eugenics agenda.

"National goals for most of the vaccinations required by 2-year-olds were set as interim steps to reaching the nation's year 2000 immunization goal of vaccinating 90 percent of 2-year-olds with all recommended vaccinations. In 1995, 95 percent of children 19 to 35 months of age had received three doses of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (DTP) vaccine, 92 percent had received three doses of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (Hib), 90 percent had received the required dose of measles, mumps, rubella vaccine (MMR), 88 percent had received three doses of polio vaccine, and 68 percent received three doses of hepatitis B vaccine (hep B). The 1995 goals were 90 percent for MMR, 87 percent for DTP, 85 percent for polio and Hib, and 50 percent for hep B"

http://www.cdc.gov/media/pressrel/vaccin2.htm


Here is a poster of their "progress"... You think they are going to stop their juggernaut? What kind of logic is that?

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/downloads/p_vacc-timeline.pdf

Tweet