This is a great thing you have done. thank you :-)
I agree with you that the paper should shy away from too much detail though to avoid confusion. That said, I would probably include, perhaps in a specific paragraph placed at the beginning and again at the end, that fine tuning ( a little more of this or less of that) may be (is) necessary for each individual to find their "sweet" spot in the protocol.
EDIT - the "sweet" spot will fluctuate with normal cycles... e.g. moon, seasons, etc.