Food for thought

But what I just posted is something you read on the internet.  How do you know that I did not make the entire post up?  I didn't of course, but how do you KNOW?

In part, perhaps you know because you have experienced my openess and honesty here at CureZone. But my point is, if someone else you did not know had posted it, you would likely find it much less believeable.  That is to be expected.  When we are confronted with information that goes against what we have been taught or what we have experienced it is natural for us to be very skeptical.

Just because something is on the internet does not make it false or true - and, lacking solid proof, we tend to judge such information according to our own perceived reality.  My point is that much of what most people perceive as reality is a filtered and distorted false reality.  Just like the so-called democratic presidential elections.

Thus the reality of secret societies and the centuries old plan for domination are perceived as unreality by most of us because of our conditioned point of reference.  Only when we are able to cast aside the "this can't possibly be true" blinders we have been shackled with and look at any and all information as neither untrue or true - in essence look at the information and seek out the facts from a null point of reference - will we be able to make better judgments.

I realize that is a tall order.

DQ