Edited
I'll take your answer as an admission that you *do* routinely censor the content of messages posted at FDC.
TK--- This is not accurate but I realize you believe so.
You inherited the FDC group from someone else.
TK--- This is also not acutate. The owner asked me to be moderator, he is free to change anything he likes and does.
It is intended for all people wishing to pursue Andy's chelation protocol to be able to freely discuss this, not have all their messages filtered through a self-serving officianado who makes the entire group dynamic centre around him.
TK--- This is not accurate either - the forum centers around the protocol, I just happen to be an active moderator and post a lot.
Not even having the courtesy to tell people why they are being censored, or even *when* they are being censored.
Tk--- Moderating a forum takes a little more time than you imagine and I can not always get back to people right away. The new member message clearly went over such things. Someone that is not familiar with forums is going to have problems understanding why things work a certain way and not everyone is always going to be happy which is why there are other forums and choices.
One example of that censorship being when someone asked whether Pectin was a sulfur food. I pointed out that it wasn't. You contradicted me saying that you had found references to suggest it was. I asked for said references. You said you "did a google search". I did a google search and got nothing, so I politely asked again. At which point you censored my message. I reposted many times over several hours not knowing why my messages hadn't shown up. Each one you censored. Finally you sent me an email saying that you would "get back to me on that", which unsurprisingly you never did, neither do I believe you intended to. Further weight to which was added when I emailed you several days later and you refused to answer.
TK--- I am not there to answer every single question people have and can not. Part of learning is reading and reserching things on your own and taking some responsibility for learning. The information you are refering to was easy to look up, I had other important things to do and was busy, continually reposting the same message to the group in order to get me to do what you needed to look up yourself was not productive.
Exactly how long does it take to do a google search? How long does it take to say "I made a mistake" - a lifetime in your case. You seem intent on correcting other peoples mistakes, yet when it comes to your own you prefer to sweep them under a carpet, even if that means misinforming people.
TK--- I did not make a mistake in the post about the information that I read, I left it up to you to research it more if you wanted to, I can't do everyone's work for them.
>There are many other froums where you can discuss anything you want such as this one.
On the one hand you reserve the position of unchallenged control which you wield over the FDC group, making sure that the entire content suits your own personal agenda.
TK--- Not correct. I only support the intent that the owner wished when he set up the forum. If you want to change the forum then you need to talk to him.
Yet you see fit to go into other forums and use/abuse them for whatever purpose you like. There is something slightly hypocritical about that.
TK--- I do not see where I have abused anything. I only made a slight correction to your post about hair analysis testing.
The purpose of this forum is most decidedly not to talk about anything you like. This is a support forum for those pursuing Andy's chelation protocol. Your arrogance speaks volumes.
TK--- Sorry no offense but this is just nonsense. I have not read any restrictions on what you can't post other than spam etc..
You accuse me of bad manners yet the very first message you post on this forum you invite someone to a rival forum
TK--- On my part I did not know it was a [rival] forum. Didn't know Curezone set up such things. My intent again was only to post a correction to some misinformation. I only stated where they could get more information, I did not post a URL or invitation to the group - IMO you are misinterpreting intent where there is none.
, which is not only the height of bad manners, but shows your true intent - to disrupt this forum to ensure that your monopoly of power continues.
TK--- I am not trying to disrupt anything, I only made one correction to some misinformation.
You are the moderator of a rival forum. That should be enough for you to not post here - call it a conflict of interest.
TK--- That is you opinion which of course you are entitled to. It isn't mine.
Your intentions are clear for all to see.
If you wish to stick around for further humiliation please do. I have only just started.
JV.
PS. if you do not leave I will inform the
Webmaster and moderators of your disruptive intentions.
TK--- I think if they read the messages they will see my post was only to make a correction to inaccurate information. I am not trying to disrupt anything. Of course if the intent of the forum is not to pass on accurate information then I made a mistake.
I will also contact yahoo groups and inform them that one of their moderators is moonlighting as a troll.
TK--- I think they would come to the same conclusion as above if they care to. Any more correspondence on this thread is unproductive. I am aware of your problem and as I have stated have no intention of causing disruption for the forum, just posting accurate information, I was not singling you out or attacking you. If just my presense on this forum causes conflict for you which it seems too try to work around it and just let the thread die.