Re: More "the facts" Re: THE FACTS

You've previously expressed your opinion that I am an nit-picker, partly because I pressed you for a definintion of what you considered to be "organic iodine". I did not do that to "win" any debate or prize, but to help educate you on precision in language. If you look at my writings, you'll see I have raised some legitimate issues with your communication. Consider them as you will, but if you take them seriously and in stride, you may be able to formulate more definite statements in the future.

In the current instance, you've once again mis-interpreted. I never said Uny was objectionable. Rather, I related that if I had edited any posts (which I do not recall doing, nor am I going back to look), then the reason was because I found the CONTENT objectionable at the time.

There is a difference between a person, and the content of a posting, which your message seems to indicate that you have failed to appreciate. I don't know you, or anyone else on here, nor do I wish to. I have no agendas for or against anyone, nor do I wish to. Some take what I write and use it to advantage, while others seem to use it as fodder for furtherance of non-productive argumentation. Which class you choose to put yourself in is entirely up to you. Another alternative is to just ignore me, and don't reply, which many mature minds undoubtedly do. Tweet