http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=909337
Just look at the most recent problems of imported foods from china, which has had "Funny Proteins" added to the foods,
The source of the poison is not “Funny Proteins” as ML so colloquially puts it but melamine, which could not be considered a protein under any circumstances. This is a maliciously false argument; it is clear from what we’ve learned that this is a case of intentional contamination. To suggest, that melamine is protein would be like saying cyanide is also protein because it contains Nitrogen.
I have been sharing about the problem of NPN in our food supply !
Well, then you’ve wandered off topic, the case with
And to provide "Proof" as to this Great problem of Funny Proteins(NPN), which is Free Nitrogen,
NPN is not protein. NPN is not free nitrogen. Free Nitrogen is (N2) nitrogen gas. NPN is a term that encompasses any nitrogenous compound not including proteins – it can include a variety of organic and inorganic compounds. Certainly the Chinese case cannot be proof for any of his points.
Why do relatively low doses of melamine result in ---"kidney failure"---! Which may happen in anything , which eats NPN, animal or Humans !!
Wrong. While technically it is true that Melamine would fall under the category of NPN. Melamine is a poison because it seems to interfere with proper function, not because it is NPN (a wide definition that could be applied to anything. For example cyanide could also be considered NPN. Now it cyanide poisonous because it happens to fall into this category? Naturally not, it is because it inhibits cellular metabolism.
What else can be considered NPN and according to ML should be considered a danger to human?
Chlorophyll. That is right, due to its nitrogen content Chlorophyll is NPN, and by ML’s logic will cause kidney failure. This is why such simplistic opinions and over-generalizations should never be taken seriously.
“The two companies illegally added melamine”
May I highlight that even in
ML is confusing the issues and hoping his readers won’t take notice and placidly nod in absent-minded agreement. Really who is against greater inspection?
Either way, this is about illegal actions, profiteering, and intentional food poisoning and not about NPN as ML would have us believe.
Just like taking Elemental Iodine, which is a Drug and may Poison in the Elemental form, when getting too much of it in relationship to the needed Alkaline Minerals !
The people in the Iodine support forum would disagree; everything is a poison if taken in excess. Even drinking pure water is poisonous if you drink too much of it, the result is a potentially fatal condition called hyponatremia.
And this same problem of too much Nitrogen may come about when Food is picked too green, and the Nitrogen in the plants have "NOT" been able to convert into "True Proteins", yet !
Wrong again. The problem with food picked to early has nothing to do with NPN, and it is more about taste and the nature of the carbohydrates. For example in bananas, when eaten green are very starchy, the breakdown of these starches into more digestible carbohydrates is what makes it palatable and easier to digest. The chemistry of ripening is complex, but it mainly about the carbs, bioactive enzymes, esters and not what ML thinks as protein. This makes sense when you consider that most fruits and vegetables are mainly water and carbohydrates, with proteins making up a minor portion of their content. For example in the banana the starch levels of a green fruit will continue to decrease and the sugar levels rise especially fructose and glucose. Proteins are not being manufactured in this example; all that is happening is that enzymes are breaking down the starches. Naturally it is more complicated than this, as in some cases esters are synthesized optimally under the vine, so product picked early lack flavour.
The feed Industry has for years been feeding "Urea" NPN to cattle and calling it High Protein supplement, and they still do this in the
It is true that urea is used in cattle feed, but unlike us, ruminants are able to process a relatively high amounts of urea and convert it to protein. The short version is this: in the stomachs of ruminants the bacteria will break down urea into ammonia and then the bacteria combined it with available carbohydrates to form amino acids and proteins.
http://www.agnet.org/library/pt/2001019/
Funny Protein(NPN) Non-Protein Nitrogen or Free Nitrogen , which is in the food supply may be Causing many of our Health problems today !!
If free nitrogen is a problem then food is the least of our worries, we should be scared every time we inhale as the air we breathe is 78% free nitrogen. In comparison we take so much more “free nitrogen” from breathing the addition of it from food is insignificant.
This whole NPN is another example of ML taking a little knowledge and turning it into a lot of ignorance.
http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=909357
And the Nitrogen is in the Isotope Alkaline form !
In addition your reference to melemine only is not true... cyanuric acid is now also associated with the melenine along with 2 other nitrogen (NPN) based products in some cases. The synergistic effect that they have is overloading the body with nitrogen and causing renal failure.
You are wrong on this. The toxic effects are not due to nitrogen overload, though the research is still not clear on the mechanisms, the simplistic view of nitrogen overload is wrong. It seems to be more closely associated with the formation of crystal shards in the kidney, something which would require massively higher dosages of other types of NPN than was associated with melamine. Just because these compounds have nitrogen, the conclusion that it is the nitrogen that is the problem is unfounded – as unfounded as blaming the nitrogen in cyanide. The appearance of cyanuric acid is not entirely unexpected, as anyone with experience with organic chemistry could tell you, when making a compound you always get several other reactions occurring alongside the one you want. In fact, I am surprised we are not hearing about the other compounds that are formed as part of melamine production. Other studies with urea indicate that lab animals can take high dosages without experiencing long term effects. In fact the recent article (yesterday as I write this) from Nature explores the use of urine as supplement for fish farms. So again, the view that ML expounds is more than simplistic, it is woefully wrong.
I apologize; I could not find the links with the other 2 chemicals (I had them up last night but lost them) found in the food products. The point remains that food manufacturers can test for melemine and/or cyanuric acid, and will miss a whole host of other waste products/chemicals that can do exactly the same thing.
That is not entirely true, due in part to the nature of organic chemistry. As I explained above, nearly all organic reactions create a number of other side reactions along with the desired one. We could test for an easily detectable by product, and the results would be presumptive for our target chemical. There are also a variety of methods that will only test for proteins and nothing else; my choice being biosensor testing. This would render the practice of spiking useless since they contaminants would not show up as protein and thus it could not be sold at higher prices nor could it be used to meet protein quotas. It would make spiking a money losing proposition.
However, how is the common man without any science supposed to understand it? How would you describe it?
I would call it spiking the samples, sometimes it is called dosing. In the mining industry it is called salting (a la Bre-X), ultimately I call it contamination.
Not sure on dosing, however it is true that if the kidneys are overloaded with nitrogen, it can result in kidney failure.
Is it usually the other way around. Kidney failure results in elevated BUN levels and other tell-tale signs.
As far as your reference to chlorophyll, we all know that nitrogen is essential to life. In this case too much of a good thing, "nitrogen" also can take life away. Minimizing or dismissing the "melemine" issue as it relates to health with a reference to Chlorophyll is misleading IMO.
I think you may have misread me. I was dismissing the simplistic NPN explanation which ML uses to suggest that melamine is dangerous because it is registers as NPN. I used the example of chlorophyll to illustrate how such simplistic view could include perfectly benign or essential compounds can also fall under the NPN category, things like chlorophyll, creatine, nucleotides and other naturally organic compounds. Can you begin to understand why this notion of “NPN is bad” is wrong, misleading and potentially dangerous?
... however as it relates to the health of the consumer it is about NPN containing substances in our foods.
I disagree; it is about melamine/ cyanuric acid contamination. For the reasons I state above.
This is again IMO misleading. Metabolism of nitrogen through respiration is very different than metabolism of nitrogen through digestion. I believe you would agree with that.
‘Tis true, it is misleading, but it was written in mockery. Free nitrogen (ie. nitrogen gas) is pretty damn stable, whether you ingest it or breathe it in, those triple bonds are a tough to break apart. Off hand I can’t recall a single pathway in which we could break it down and have it interact.
From Wikipedia
Nitrogen is a nonmetal, with an electronegativity of 3.0. It has five electrons in its outer shell and is therefore trivalent in most compounds. The triple bond in molecular nitrogen (N2) is one of the strongest in nature. The resulting difficulty of converting (N2) into other compounds, and the ease (and associated high energy release) of converting nitrogen compounds into elemental N2, have dominated the role of nitrogen in both nature and human economic activities.
The insistent use of the term contamination while technically accurate, minimizes and conceals the very real fact that this is a deliberate criminal act.
I have no problem with you (or me) calling it intentional contamination. Illegal contamination? Criminal contamination? Choose the modifier you like.
There are several reasons I choose the term contamination. Firstly, it highlights the fact that this food is dangerous and not fit for consumption. It also tells the reader the product contains something outside the normal parameters. The term salting, spiking, dosing does not do that (for me) since many products are spiked with things like vitamins, minerals, probiotics, nutraceuticals – none of which are generally considered contaminants, and in many cases you actually want them in your food.
You state that the mechanism is not clear and then state I am wrong (it would be more accurately stated in ALL your posts that you THINK someone is wrong and then better for you when found wanting in challenge)... perhaps I am not.
Maybe I should have written that you appear to be wrong, based on initial work and not that your ARE wrong. Perhaps you might be correct, however I also base my opinion on the fact that there are other types of contaminants and poisons that can cause kidney failure that are nitrogen free. The various examples again point to the simple idea that NPN is bad for the liver as incorrect, it is not definitive but enough to say the evidence does not point that way.
Further research has led me to much documentation where melamine and cyanuric acid can both together, or separately cause these crystals to form in the kidneys. The earliest reference to this I have found is 1958 in sheep.
I am not sure why you bring this up, I have never said melamine or cyanuric acid was good for our health, nor have I argued that it is not the source of the contamination. What I have said was; that to argue that they are dangerous because we can classify them as NPN is blatantly wrong. They are toxic because (tautology up ahead) they are toxic not because they contain nitrogen. If I had to guess based on the structure of the chemical I would investigate the action of the double bond of H-C=O:, the lone pairs and the ring with the double bonds which could be opened, like other carbon ring structures. It is their chemistry, and their interactions with tissues or proteins that make them toxic, not the nitrogen.
C - "Just because these compounds have nitrogen, the conclusion that it is the nitrogen that is the problem is unfounded"
I think you are wrong and again misleading and misdirecting. The nitrogen is a large component of the chemical structure of NPN containing substances without which the crystalline precipitate would most likely not occur.
Yes, GRZ and benzene is carbon and hydrogen, would you recommend that we avoid carbon and hydrogen because benzene is toxic? Of course you would not. The nitrogen is not the problem; it is the chemistry of melamine that is the source of danger. From where I stand ML is lying to us (willfully or due to ignorance) and you are misleading us by supporting his views. I think the readers here and on the other forum are smart enough to recognize (when properly informed) that the chemistry of two compounds can be vastly different even if they both happen to have nitrogen as part of their formula. They deserve better than the “NPN is bad” mantra that ML pushes and you now endorse.
We are dealing with very different forms here; in other words there is a very real difference between the nitrogen in chlorophyll and the nitrogen in melamine.
And why we should call a spade by its name and melamine by its name rather than the generic NPN. Just as it is clearly wrong to say that NPN is bad, and therefore chlorophyll, which also falls under the NPN label, is bad. Such simplistic explanations do not benefit anyone and only serve to feed ML’s ego.
Another absurd generalization would be to say that because many snake poisons are a collection of enzymes, enzymes are bad – hell you could even generalized it even further and say that proteins are dangerous because enzymes are proteins. Generalizations are usually bad (maybe even this one)