The original post should be apart of the newsletter with anyone else's who offers FIRST HAND experiences of the Rife Conference gathering.
G. got to tell ya, I'm hurt you did not even notify me you were going. I thought we had a way closer relation than that? I offend you somewhere along the way? :)
WOW, I also have to say that:
1. That was a great initial write up I'd like to see followed up.
2. I was completely wrong. I would have wagered good $ that you were going to choose the Peter Walker represented Ergonom microscope as the most significant and important impact at the conference. They've prepared for the release of it for a long time as well as the entire presentation. But again, I was wrong. The syncrometer, eh holds the title in your opinion? Have you dusted yours of yet? I have just been put off by the real numbers of how many people give up on becoming proficient with them after purchase. That has nothing at all to do with whether they are proficient at comparative resonance or not. Merely proves that the device takes patience, a good ear and intestinal fortitude to work with proficiently.
Fortunately I have kept my mind open. Although we would both agree it is paramount to keep several different guns in our holsters, I have speculated that one day it would either be a high wattage rf carrier driven resonant plasma device...OR....the full blown and involved plate zapping concept with a robin Atelier FG doing the "dirty work" for my own future frequency therapy experimentation. Yep, notice I did not mention the fscan2, syncrometer, or ? for comparative resonance. I know, I know. You went to the con for all the right reasons. To find a means of pathogen detection that was repeatable. You were probably one of the most unique and insightful one's there. Many of us are bent on treatment (myself included), and have placed the "cart before the horse" by not asking manufacturers to cintinue to place their R/D funds towards a good comparative resonance device like the fscan2...but with extremely consistent (objective) and repeatable results and at a far cheaper price. I guess that $5000 syncrometer type device we once saw way back when has a *few* of those qualities.
I still don't know. As you know some time back a few people in Europe had shown and discussed their syncrometer style devices based off clark's, but required a few hundred thousand dollars for further R/D and production. Don't know where that stands. Sounded much more visual and automated...if I can use that word liberally. I have to be honest, I haven't been playing ball on this side of the Clark fence this year and wanted to be more open minded and include various other tech as well. But I am going to continue to consider Rife plasma vs plate zapping. Again, I know your point. They both have limited use without a comparative resonant "diagnostic" device. Honestly, manufacturers know we need one/others, but it isn't easy. James Berger is working on his much different idea, while Ken Uzzel I believe is working on a remote body scan with Frex 14. I THINK, just nothing on the exacting level of a clark syncrometer? Ahhhh, deep breath. Man, am I going to have to learn that syncrometer device. I can just see flying objects in the house. ;) I have found a few good slide manufacturers...lost in bookmarks. One in denmark I think tht was insane. I've tried to tell the rife and lyme group to consider using the borelia slides and 3 others related to that bug with a plate zapper and fg/zapper, but I think no one has tried it. With so many peps on that forum and being that the bb is so serious, they would either see IMMEDIATE and serious herxs (opinion) or discover that the technology lacks penetration and the circuit construction is hogwash. Sure, I think the plate zapping concept works. And sutherland says it can be used with plasma and the plates as well. So that would be a great synergistic move option possiblly.
My friend seems to really like the plate zapping with humnan body samples (no slides). I'm glad you posted and will again remind myself of the direction I was going to previously take which is plate zapping with slides. Sadly there are still very few people that are aware of this technique and even few like myself employing it. Maryellen seems to like it. Jeff sutherland has told me that he really likes it (essentially), and I know you have some use with plate zapping as well (limited?). So what is your evauluation as far as effectiveness? Anything subjective like herxes or "physical manifestations?"
For treatment I think frequency (for me) is still more important for treatment than magnetics or e-field. And since *I** feel this, then it becomes a matter of full body penetration (for me at least). The plate zapping and radiant plamsa both are worthy of further experimentation to counter tissue resistance concerns.
Digressing, I continue to be surprised just how few a % of people are up on Clark's latest research and most importantly her devices AND WHAT THEY ARE CAPABLE ABOVE AND BEYOND HER SIMPLE ZAPPER CIRCUIT!
You said, """So, the conclusion, the syncrometer won hands down for the ultimate testing device.""""
Honestly, I have only seen a few people "here and there" that wield it with experience. Are you gaining results with it? I have seen the canadian company I have recommended to people....their bodywide comparative resonance of a friend minus the brain. I mean, the evaluation from the syncrometer showed she had about 80% of what was being tested for. To include several diferent bacterias, heavy metals, etc correlated to the organ in distress. I looked at it for awhile and just throw my hands up and said (so and so) bascially has nearly everything tested for! I really dont know/never seen this person, so couldn't really tell ya what her health was like. Suffice it to say, that general duration frequency therapy availeth much. Not to mention general herbs which have dominated for me. A crushing, meaningful blow to microbes neither they nor me saw coming. A compartive resonance device with quantifiable, extremely consistent "diagnostics" at a low $ would be great, but in the meantime I've got pretty much all the "roomates" and many many different things work. Getting back to FULL wellness, well AT THAT POINT I would be very interested in using something as precise (?) as the syncrometer.
And for those of you who think a high powered rife/bare is expensive, I'll remind you that those slides/tissue sample don't come cheap. It is VERY easy to run up a tab while investing in more tissue slides as your interests grow. Sure you can make your own homegrown slides, but there are huge limitations there versus microscope slides.
G., you should have seen the slide selection at that European website versus Wards and the other co. clark suggests. WOW.
Did you get an opportunity to smooze with Don Tunney of resonantlight or Dave Trebing of Virant Health? Both Rife/Bare designers. They were both in exhibitions. Any thoughts on their plasma setups?
Would like to see other observations posted here you felt/think noteworthy.
©†ƒ……•™¼‡_Original_Message_¾€š½ž¢«»¬ï°©
The original post should be apart of the newsletter with anyone else's who offers FIRST HAND experiences of the Rife Conference gathering.
G. got to tell ya, I'm hurt you did not even notify me you were going. I thought we had a way closer relation than that? I offend you somewhere along the way? :)
WOW, I also have to say that:
1. That was a great write up.
2. I was completely wrong. I would have wagered good $ that you were going to choose the Peter Walker represented Ergonom microscope as the most significant and important impact at the conference. They've prepared for the release of it for a long time as well as the entire presentation. But again, I was wrong. The syncrometer, eh holds the title in your opinion? Have you dusted yours of yet? Man, I have just been put off by the real numbers of how many people give up on becoming proficient with them after purchase. That has nothing at all to do we with whether they are proficient at comparative resonance or not. Merely proves that the device takes patience, a good ear and intestinal fortitude to work with proficiently.
Fortunately I have kept my mind open. Although we would both agree it is paramount to keep several different guns in our holsters, I have speculated that one day it would either be either a high wattage rf carrier driven resonant plasma device...OR....the full blown and involved plate zapping concept with a robin Atelier FG doing the "dirty work." Yep, notice I did not mention the fscan2, syncrometer, or ? for comparative resonance. I know, I know. You went to the con for all the right reasons. To find a means of pathogen detection that was repeatable. You were probably one of the most unique and insightful one's there. Many of us are bent on treatment (myself included), and have placed the "cart before the horse" by not asking manufacturers to cintinur to place their R/D funds towards a comparative resonance device like the fscan2..but with more consistent (objective) and repeatable results and at a far cheaper price. I guess that $5000 syncrometer type device we once saw way back has a *few* of those qualities.
I still don't know. As you know some time back a few people in Europe had shown and discussed their syncrometer style devices based off clark's, but required a few hundred thousand dollars for further R/D and production. Don't know where that stands. Sounded much more visual and automated...if I can use that word liberally. I have to be honest, I haven't been played ball on this side of the Clark fence this year and wanted to be more open minded and include various other tech as well. But I am going to continue to consider Rife plasma vs plate zapping. Again, I know your point. They both have limited use with a comparative resonant diagnostic device. Honestly, manufacturers know we need one/others, but it isn't easy. James Berger is working on his much different idea, while Ken Uzzel I believe is working on a remote body scan with Frex 14. I THINK, just nothing on the exacting level of a clark syncrometer. Ahhhh, deep breath. Man, am I going to have to learn that syncrometer device. I can just see flying objects in the house. ;) I have found a few good slide manufacturers...lost in bookmarks. One in denmark I think tht was insane. I've tried to tell the rife and lyme group to consider using the borelia slides and 3 others realted to that bug with a plate zapper and fg/zapper, but I think no one has tried it. With so many peps on that forum and being that the bb is so serious, they would either see IMMEDIATE and serious herxs (opinion) or discover that the technology lacks penetration and the circuit construction is hogwash. Sure, I think the plate zapping concept works. And sutherland says it can be used with plasma a the plates as well. So that would be a great synergistic move option possiblly.
My friend seems to really like the plate zapping with humnan body samples (no slides). I'm glad you posted and will again remind myself of the direction I was going to previously take which is plate zapping with slides. Sadly there are still very few people that are aware of this technique and even few like myself employing it. Maryellen seems to like it. Jeff sutherland has told me that he really likes it (essentially), and I know you have some use with plate zapping as well (limited?). So what is your evauluation as far as efectiveness? Anything subjective like herxes or "physical manifestations?"
For treatment I think frequency (for me) is still more important for treatment than magnetics or e-field. And since *I** feel this, then it becomes a matter of full body penetration (for me at least). The plate zapping and radiant plamsa both are worthy of further experimentation to counter tissue resistance concerns.
Digressing, I continue to be surprised just how few a % of people are up on Clark's latest research and most importantly her devices AND WHAT THEY ARE CAPABLE ABOVE AND BEYOND HER SIMPLE ZAPPER CIRCUIT!
You said, """So, the conclusion, the syncrometer won hands down for the ultimate testing device.""""
Honestly, I have only seen a few people "here and a few people there" that wield it with experience. Are you gaining results with it? I have seen the canadian company I have recommended to people....their bodywide comparative resonance of a friend minus the head. I mean, the evaluation from the syncrometer showed she had about 80% of what was being tested for. To include several diferent bacterias, heavy metals, etc and the organ in distress. I looked at it for awhile and just throw my hands up and said (so and so) bascially has everything tested for! I really dont know/never seen this person, so couldn't really tell ya what her health was like. Suffice it to say, that general duration frequency therapy availeth much. Not to mention general herbs which have dominated for me. A crushing, meaningful blow to microbes neither they not me saw coming. A compartive resonance device with quantifiable, consistent "diagnostics" would be great, but in the meantime I've got pretty much all the "roomates" and many many different things work. Getting back to FULL wellness, well AT THAT POINT I would be very interested in using something as precise (?) as the syncrometer.
And for those of you who think a high powered rife/bare is expensive, I'll remind you that those slides/tissue sample don't come cheap. It is VERY easy to run up a tab while investing in more tissue slides as your interests grow. Sure you can make your own homegrown slides, but there are huge limitations there versus microscope slides.
Man G., you should have seen the slide selection at that European website versus Wards and the other co. clark suggests. WOW.
And you brought a girl friend to the Con for me too? Shesh. Wow, you really don't like me. ;) Must be the garlic.
Did you get an opportunity to smooze with Don Tunney of resonantlight or Dave Trebing of Virant Health? Both Rife/Bare designers. They were both in exhibitions. Any thoughts on their plasma setups?
Would like to see other observations posted here you felt/think noteworthy.